If it's interesting enough to generate a patent then it is worthwhile.  The
world would sit up and take notice simply because Rossi ain't a fraud, as
the common notion suggests.


On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 9:19 AM, Blaze Spinnaker <blazespinna...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Another possibility is IH may have decided they don't want the world
> competing with them, so they gave the researchers an eCat which is just
> enough interesting to generate a patent but not so interesting it causes
> the world to sit up and take notice.
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 9:12 AM, Blaze Spinnaker <blazespinna...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> More and more I'm beginning to wonder if we're going to get a TIP report
>> that shows something interesting, but nowhere guaranteeing the power
>> densities shown in the first report.
>>
>> While I believe that Rossi believes he has something and that IH believes
>> they have something and that there is no fraudulent behavior going on here,
>> I think the truth is somewhere in the middle.
>>
>> And the middle is, yes energy, just not very exciting energy.  And
>> possibly, after some analysis, it could be just an impressive new source of
>> chemical energy that's competitive perhaps with Rocket Fuel in the best
>> case scenario, but in reality it's just competitive with optimal Geothermal.
>>
>> In this scenario, I consider the eCat not to have lived up to its
>> promises which is why my estimate is around 35%.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 6:19 PM, Blaze Spinnaker <
>> blazespinna...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Decreasing the probability to 31% based on smelly stock offering.
>>>
>>>
>>> http://freeenergyscams.com/andrea-rossi-e-cat-hydro-fusion-cashing-in-before-the-collapse/
>>>
>>> HydroFusion is ran by Dr. Magnus Holm.  Seems credible - but why didn't
>>> he wait until after the report to ask for more money?  Why is Rossi doing
>>> shout outs about Dr Holm?
>>>
>>> Andrea Rossi
>>> May 18th, 2014 at 11:20 PM
>>> <http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=848&cpage=1#comment-957368>
>>>
>>> Orsobubu:
>>> Thank you for your comment, that indroduces us to the paper published
>>> today on the Journal of Nuclear Physics:
>>> GEOMETRY OF STRING THEORY SOLITONS
>>> by Dr Magnus Holm . It is an important work of this scientist made in
>>> 1999, but I find his work dense of important information. It is not an easy
>>> reading, the work is rigorous, but this is the Journal of Nuclear Physics,
>>> and the paper is perfectly in line with the field of application of our
>>> Journal. Dr Magnus Holm is presently working also with me for the E-Cat.
>>> About the comment of our friend Orsobubu: I do not share his certainties
>>> regarding the so called “social sciences”.
>>> Warm Regards,
>>> A.R.
>>>
>>> This could be just really inane business strategy or perhaps Magnus just
>>> doesn't have a good contract with Rossi/IH.
>>>
>>> For those who really believe in Rossi, my suggestion would be to contact
>>> Hydro fusion and buy up as many shares as you possibly can.
>>>
>>> I think everything comes down to this report that should be coming over
>>> the next month.   We could see a rise over over 20-30% on the basis of this
>>> report.
>>>
>>> Another possibility is that the report may reveal a low COP which is
>>> competitive only with geothermal and could be the result of uninteresting
>>> fuel sources. (which means a drop in probability of 10% or so)
>>>
>>> Another (unlikely in my mind) possibility is that the report will reveal
>>> that it doesn't do anything useful, which will be a drop in 25%.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 10:41 PM, Blaze Spinnaker <
>>> blazespinna...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Decreasing the probability to 35% based on shattering news of the
>>>> Defkalion demo being completely worthless.  I hesitate to say it, but It
>>>> almost sounds like fraud is being implied.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> http://animpossibleinvention.com/2014/05/12/defkalion-demo-proven-not-to-be-reliable/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 5:03 PM, Blaze Spinnaker <
>>>> blazespinna...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Decreasing probability to 46% based on lack of news from Nanor but up
>>>>> to 47% based on recent news from Darden in China:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.icebank.cn/news/detail_2.php?id=118
>>>>>
>>>>> hat tip:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.e-catworld.com/2014/05/09/tom-darden-involved-in-opening-of-nickel-hydrogen-energy-research-center-in-tianjin-china/
>>>>>
>>>>> Note:  I suspect there will be an up to (-30%, +15%) swing in
>>>>> probability when the june report comes out.  Big news indeed.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 11:25 AM, Blaze Spinnaker <
>>>>> blazespinna...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Increasing the probability to 47% on the basis on Nanor / MIT videos.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Blaze Spinnaker <
>>>>>> blazespinna...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Put that back to 43%:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Mr. Darden earned an MRP in environmental planning from the
>>>>>>> University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill,* a JD from Yale Law
>>>>>>> School* and a BA from the University of North Carolina at Chapel
>>>>>>> Hill, where he was a Morehead Scholar.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 3:22 PM, Blaze Spinnaker <
>>>>>>> blazespinna...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Correction, make that 41%.  It's not Cherokee but rather  Tom
>>>>>>>> Darden (investor, co founder of Cherokee) and Mr. Vaughn (senior 
>>>>>>>> analyst at
>>>>>>>> Cherokee, BA Economics)  who are the players here.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It'd be good to find out who those other investors are.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Blaze Spinnaker <
>>>>>>>> blazespinna...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Increasing the probability to 44% on the basis of Cherokee PR
>>>>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Big big BIG news.   Now this is no longer about Rossi, but about
>>>>>>>>> Cherokee.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I know you guys think I'm a git for my doubt, but hey, my model is
>>>>>>>>> waaaay ahead of the curve than the vast majority of the investing 
>>>>>>>>> universe.
>>>>>>>>>    XOM is still trading near historical highs, for example.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 12:39 PM, Blaze Spinnaker <
>>>>>>>>> blazespinna...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Increasing the probability back to 35% based on the latest news
>>>>>>>>>> coming out of BLP and McKubre.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>  Hopefully we'll see some more encouraging things soon.   The
>>>>>>>>>> next indie report on the ecat should be an interesting inflection 
>>>>>>>>>> report.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 7:52 AM, Blaze Spinnaker <
>>>>>>>>>> blazespinna...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Fulvio , the tech Director & R.D. at Leonardo Corporation MIAMI
>>>>>>>>>>> - FL - USA previous job was:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> " Frelance Consultant
>>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.linkedin.com/search?search=&title=Frelance+Consultant&sortCriteria=R&keepFacets=true&currentTitle=CP&trk=prof-exp-title>
>>>>>>>>>>>  European
>>>>>>>>>>> Gaming and Gambling Tech Market
>>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.linkedin.com/search?search=&company=European+Gaming+and+Gambling+Tech+Market&sortCriteria=R&keepFacets=true&trk=prof-exp-company-name>
>>>>>>>>>>> "
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> -4%
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Now back to 31%.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 6:21 AM, Blaze Spinnaker <
>>>>>>>>>>> blazespinna...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> This is based on
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>    - STMicro patent (Increased about 4.5%)
>>>>>>>>>>>>    - Cherokee Investments (Increased about 2.5%)
>>>>>>>>>>>>    - Rossi stating third party reports in March (increased 2%)
>>>>>>>>>>>>    - Lack of news from Defkalion (-1%)
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> News seems to be coming in fairly rapidly at this point.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Could be updating this probability more frequently.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to