Going to start publishing updates on this blog http://rossiisreal.wordpress.com/ rather than this mailing list.
Rossi is now at 30% On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 8:46 PM, Kevin O'Malley <[email protected]> wrote: > If it's interesting enough to generate a patent then it is worthwhile. > The world would sit up and take notice simply because Rossi ain't a fraud, > as the common notion suggests. > > > On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 9:19 AM, Blaze Spinnaker <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Another possibility is IH may have decided they don't want the world >> competing with them, so they gave the researchers an eCat which is just >> enough interesting to generate a patent but not so interesting it causes >> the world to sit up and take notice. >> >> >> On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 9:12 AM, Blaze Spinnaker <[email protected] >> > wrote: >> >>> More and more I'm beginning to wonder if we're going to get a TIP report >>> that shows something interesting, but nowhere guaranteeing the power >>> densities shown in the first report. >>> >>> While I believe that Rossi believes he has something and that IH >>> believes they have something and that there is no fraudulent behavior going >>> on here, I think the truth is somewhere in the middle. >>> >>> And the middle is, yes energy, just not very exciting energy. And >>> possibly, after some analysis, it could be just an impressive new source of >>> chemical energy that's competitive perhaps with Rocket Fuel in the best >>> case scenario, but in reality it's just competitive with optimal Geothermal. >>> >>> In this scenario, I consider the eCat not to have lived up to its >>> promises which is why my estimate is around 35%. >>> >>> >>> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 6:19 PM, Blaze Spinnaker < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Decreasing the probability to 31% based on smelly stock offering. >>>> >>>> >>>> http://freeenergyscams.com/andrea-rossi-e-cat-hydro-fusion-cashing-in-before-the-collapse/ >>>> >>>> HydroFusion is ran by Dr. Magnus Holm. Seems credible - but why didn't >>>> he wait until after the report to ask for more money? Why is Rossi doing >>>> shout outs about Dr Holm? >>>> >>>> Andrea Rossi >>>> May 18th, 2014 at 11:20 PM >>>> <http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=848&cpage=1#comment-957368> >>>> >>>> Orsobubu: >>>> Thank you for your comment, that indroduces us to the paper published >>>> today on the Journal of Nuclear Physics: >>>> GEOMETRY OF STRING THEORY SOLITONS >>>> by Dr Magnus Holm . It is an important work of this scientist made in >>>> 1999, but I find his work dense of important information. It is not an easy >>>> reading, the work is rigorous, but this is the Journal of Nuclear Physics, >>>> and the paper is perfectly in line with the field of application of our >>>> Journal. Dr Magnus Holm is presently working also with me for the E-Cat. >>>> About the comment of our friend Orsobubu: I do not share his >>>> certainties regarding the so called “social sciences”. >>>> Warm Regards, >>>> A.R. >>>> >>>> This could be just really inane business strategy or perhaps Magnus >>>> just doesn't have a good contract with Rossi/IH. >>>> >>>> For those who really believe in Rossi, my suggestion would be to >>>> contact Hydro fusion and buy up as many shares as you possibly can. >>>> >>>> I think everything comes down to this report that should be coming over >>>> the next month. We could see a rise over over 20-30% on the basis of this >>>> report. >>>> >>>> Another possibility is that the report may reveal a low COP which is >>>> competitive only with geothermal and could be the result of uninteresting >>>> fuel sources. (which means a drop in probability of 10% or so) >>>> >>>> Another (unlikely in my mind) possibility is that the report will >>>> reveal that it doesn't do anything useful, which will be a drop in 25%. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 10:41 PM, Blaze Spinnaker < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Decreasing the probability to 35% based on shattering news of the >>>>> Defkalion demo being completely worthless. I hesitate to say it, but It >>>>> almost sounds like fraud is being implied. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> http://animpossibleinvention.com/2014/05/12/defkalion-demo-proven-not-to-be-reliable/ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 5:03 PM, Blaze Spinnaker < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Decreasing probability to 46% based on lack of news from Nanor but up >>>>>> to 47% based on recent news from Darden in China: >>>>>> >>>>>> http://www.icebank.cn/news/detail_2.php?id=118 >>>>>> >>>>>> hat tip: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> http://www.e-catworld.com/2014/05/09/tom-darden-involved-in-opening-of-nickel-hydrogen-energy-research-center-in-tianjin-china/ >>>>>> >>>>>> Note: I suspect there will be an up to (-30%, +15%) swing in >>>>>> probability when the june report comes out. Big news indeed. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 11:25 AM, Blaze Spinnaker < >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Increasing the probability to 47% on the basis on Nanor / MIT videos. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Blaze Spinnaker < >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Put that back to 43%: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Mr. Darden earned an MRP in environmental planning from the >>>>>>>> University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill,* a JD from Yale Law >>>>>>>> School* and a BA from the University of North Carolina at Chapel >>>>>>>> Hill, where he was a Morehead Scholar. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 3:22 PM, Blaze Spinnaker < >>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Correction, make that 41%. It's not Cherokee but rather Tom >>>>>>>>> Darden (investor, co founder of Cherokee) and Mr. Vaughn (senior >>>>>>>>> analyst at >>>>>>>>> Cherokee, BA Economics) who are the players here. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> It'd be good to find out who those other investors are. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Blaze Spinnaker < >>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Increasing the probability to 44% on the basis of Cherokee PR >>>>>>>>>> release. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Big big BIG news. Now this is no longer about Rossi, but about >>>>>>>>>> Cherokee. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I know you guys think I'm a git for my doubt, but hey, my model >>>>>>>>>> is waaaay ahead of the curve than the vast majority of the investing >>>>>>>>>> universe. XOM is still trading near historical highs, for example. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 12:39 PM, Blaze Spinnaker < >>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Increasing the probability back to 35% based on the latest news >>>>>>>>>>> coming out of BLP and McKubre. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hopefully we'll see some more encouraging things soon. The >>>>>>>>>>> next indie report on the ecat should be an interesting inflection >>>>>>>>>>> report. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 7:52 AM, Blaze Spinnaker < >>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Fulvio , the tech Director & R.D. at Leonardo Corporation MIAMI >>>>>>>>>>>> - FL - USA previous job was: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> " Frelance Consultant >>>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.linkedin.com/search?search=&title=Frelance+Consultant&sortCriteria=R&keepFacets=true¤tTitle=CP&trk=prof-exp-title> >>>>>>>>>>>> European >>>>>>>>>>>> Gaming and Gambling Tech Market >>>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.linkedin.com/search?search=&company=European+Gaming+and+Gambling+Tech+Market&sortCriteria=R&keepFacets=true&trk=prof-exp-company-name> >>>>>>>>>>>> " >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> -4% >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Now back to 31%. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 6:21 AM, Blaze Spinnaker < >>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> This is based on >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> - STMicro patent (Increased about 4.5%) >>>>>>>>>>>>> - Cherokee Investments (Increased about 2.5%) >>>>>>>>>>>>> - Rossi stating third party reports in March (increased 2%) >>>>>>>>>>>>> - Lack of news from Defkalion (-1%) >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> News seems to be coming in fairly rapidly at this point. >>>>>>>>>>>>> Could be updating this probability more frequently. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
