I think a reasonable (and pretty fundamental assumption) of a third party report is that the inventor is not involved in anyway. Given that Rossi trusted them enough to handle it without his presence or his lab, you have to wonder why he didn't trust them enough to use a lab saw on it.
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 4:49 AM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe < [email protected]> wrote: > It depends on if they really thought it compromozied the integrity. If you > run the test for 30 days at COP 3-4 you may well > relax on this point arguing that it would be insane of Rossi to try play a > trick then, risking getting caught. > > On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 1:40 PM, Blaze Spinnaker <[email protected] > > wrote: > >> They compromised the integrity of the report because they were afraid to >> handle a lab saw? >> >> On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 4:10 AM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I'm not sure but It takes a practical man to do it and whatever Ross >>> is, he is surly is one hell of a man to work with tools so I guess it was >>> just an easy thing to do and the testers thought that they could monitor >>> it quite enough still to avoid cheating. >>> >>> On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Blaze Spinnaker < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> ..that he had to do the ash extraction himself, why would have leave it >>>> in the hands of the third party for so long? What keeps them from simply >>>> cutting it apart and figuring out what's inside themselves? >>>> >>>> If he felt he could trust them not to do that, why not trust them with >>>> instructions on how to cut it and extract the ash? >>>> >>>> What rational reason was there that he had to be the one doing it? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
