Blaze Spinnaker <[email protected]> wrote: They compromised the integrity of the report because they were afraid to > handle a lab saw? >
They did not compromise the integrity of anything. That's silly. This test was not intended to convince you, or the skeptics, or anyone else. It was done to meet the stated goals of IH and Elforsk. It met those goals. That fact that some members of the peanut gallery here, and various skeptics on the Internet, have made half-baked critiques of the work does not change that. It is easy to ensure that Rossi did not add "fake ashes." As I pointed out earlier there is not a single reason why he would do that in the first place, and no way it would benefit him. No rational person would worry about that. Especially not after taking sensible precautions to prevent it. The skeptics who keep claiming he might have added fake ashes have not answered me because they never look at the weakness of their own arguments. You seem to think this test was done for your benefit, to meet your criteria. It was not. As for the results, you can take them or leave them. Rossi, Levi, IH and Elforsk do not care what you think, and they do not care about accusations of fraud. I have enough contact with these people to confirm that. - Jed
