He was the one that designed and built the reactor, so he is/was the best choice to be the one to cut it open and remove the charge. Seems pretty logical to me. I guess maybe they ( the scientist in third party test) just don't have the same feeling that a lot of the pathoskeptics have, and that is, at every step Rossi was just waiting to make his move and deceive them. I know it probably would have been better if Rossi had left the planet during the test but even then someone would claim deception by quantum manipulation through the "spooky force". I sure wish that the Patent Office would grant him his patent and all this nonsense would be over. He could reveal everything, go into full production and the research coffers would fill up. Oh well, maybe some day. At 05:01 AM 10/12/2014, you wrote:
I think a reasonable (and pretty fundamental assumption) of a third party report is that the inventor is not involved in anyway.  Given that Rossi trusted them enough to handle it without his presence or his lab, you have to wonder why he didn't trust them enough to use a lab saw on it. On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 4:49 AM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe <<mailto:[email protected]>[email protected]> wrote: It depends on if they really thought it compromozied the integrity. If you run the test for 30 days at COP 3-4 you may well relax on this point arguing that it would be insane of Rossi to try play a trick then, risking getting caught. On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 1:40 PM, Blaze Spinnaker <<mailto:[email protected]>[email protected]> wrote: They compromised the integrity of the report because they were afraid to handle a lab saw? On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 4:10 AM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe <<mailto:[email protected]>[email protected]> wrote: I'm not sure but It takes a practical man to do it and whatever  Ross is, he is surly is one hell of a man to work with tools so I guess it was just an easy thing to do and the testers thought that they could monitor it quite enough still to avoid cheating. On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Blaze Spinnaker <<mailto:[email protected]>[email protected]> wrote: ..that he had to do the ash extraction himself, why would have leave it in the hands of the third party for so long? What keeps them from simply cutting it apart and figuring out what's inside themselves?  If he felt he could trust them not to do that, why not trust them with instructions on how to cut it and extract the ash?  What rational reason was there that he had to be the one doing it? No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - <http://www.avg.com>www.avg.com Version: 2014.0.4765 / Virus Database: 4040/8371 - Release Date: 10/11/14
----- No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 2014.0.4765 / Virus Database: 4040/8371 - Release Date: 10/11/14
