Lalo Martins wrote:

> Oooh, interesting thought.  Would types and contextual names be allowed
> to be unicode too?

Probably not,

It would be nice I guess, but I don't think it's at all neccesary. Plus,
then URLs would be potentially multibyte or otherwise in obscure
encodings and that would cause problems for external apps.

I dunno though, I like the idea of getting away from the English-centric
nature of software and the net...


vos-d mailing list

Reply via email to