Hi Patrick,
On Thu, Jan 5, 2001, at 11:53 AM, you wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > In a message of 02-Jan-01 Julian Aronowitz wrote:
> >
> > > 3. In either case, you *must* delete those files which are mean-
> > > ingless to you, to avoid having wasted space. This would be done
> > > between times that you delete your entire cache and start from
> > > scratch.
> >
> > No, it is ridiculous manually to delete part of the cache. Using a
> > cache you will always "waste" space, but if you start to delete those
> > files that cause this "waste" then you are stupid (IMO) and wasting
> > your time.
>
> I used to edit my cache all the time with V 2.95 using the
> CacheBrowser, and I never considered it a waste (or stupid); because
> with some sites, I wanted to save the info, so I would copy code and
> images to a Zip disk. In addition, some sites were left permanently
> in the cache, as well as "backing" them up, for quick reference.
> Because of this, it was necessary to turn off the Expire Option, so
> they wouldn't be deleted. So, I HAD to manually edit and delete those
> files I no longer wanted or needed.
>
>
> --
> Patrick Bartek
> NoLife Polymath Group
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Just to set the record straight, for all of us, I wrote the
first set of words, beginning with "5. ...." The other paragraph
was written by whomever had answered me.
I am glad you understood my reasoning: that you do not *have*
to do things that particular way; that it is only an option. You
stated what I was trying to get across, in a much clearer manner,
thank you.
Julian.
--------------------------------------------------------
Author of "MSH Tutorial V. 3.0". Found on Aminet -- MSHTut30.lha
Julian Aronowitz. Tel.: (718) 654-1681;
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_____________________________________________________________________
Voyager Mailing List - http://v3.vapor.com/
Voyager FAQ....: http://faq.vapor.com/voyager/
Listserver Help: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=HELP
Unsubscribe....: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=UNSUBSCRIBE
