LOL. That's generous of you Rod. :-D

Cheers,
Carlo

On 2011-07-11, at 14:27, Rod Lavington wrote:

> You win Carlo.
> 
> Cheers
> 
> Rod :)
> On Jul 11, 2011 2:19 PM, "cm" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi Rod,
> > 
> > I have no reason to doubt what Andy Rubin said on that occasion -- in 
> > particular the "crappy experiences", but a platform cannot be both open and 
> > closed at the same time. Part of the so-called freedom of open software is 
> > that users and companies can take the software in whatever direction they 
> > choose. Google is not ready for that to happen so for the present at least 
> > the software is not open.
> > 
> > When you say Apple fanatics what do you mean exactly? Do mean that all 
> > users of Apple products are deluded in some fashion into believing that 
> > they are using quality software? It's strange that Apple's competitors seem 
> > to be fanatics as well as the phone and table offerings are mostly 
> > following behind Apple's lead as fast as their production teams can copy 
> > them. Have a look at smartphones before the iPhone and have a look at 
> > smartphones now. You can do the same for tablets -- which weren't even a 
> > popular category of product before the iPad.
> > 
> > As for WebOS, when you say "over all the mobile platforms", I hope you mean 
> > over all your mobile platforms as I am quite happy with iOS.
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > Carlo
> > 
> > On 2011-07-11, at 13:52, Rod Lavington wrote:
> > 
> >> So this quote from the second article:
> >> 
> >> "Android boss Andy Rubin says Honeycomb is not ready for phones. If Google 
> >> were to open it up to the world at large, it could end up on smartphones 
> >> and users might end up with some crappy experiences."
> >> 
> >> does not suggest that Google are keeping Honeycomb closed shop for a 
> >> reason, other than not keeping it open? So, Apple fanatics believe 
> >> everything that comes out of Cupertino as gospel, yet don't believe the 
> >> head of Google's Android division.....
> >> 
> >> Anyhoo, the issue is more about the security of social networks, not about 
> >> one particular platform's misgivings :)
> >> 
> >> Personally, I would use WebOS over all the mobile platforms in a 
> >> heartbeat. Alas, its not available in Australia (yet)
> >> 
> >> Seeya
> >> 
> >> Rod
> >> 
> >> 
> >> On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 1:24 PM, cm <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> Hi Rod,
> >> 
> >> I agree that Google does needs to do something as the Android platform 
> >> fragmentation and security is woeful. I just think that many Android 
> >> supporters don't see the contradiction when they complain that Apple is 
> >> keeping the iPhone closed and that it should be open like Android, when 
> >> the reality is that Google is now trying to imitate the success of the 
> >> iPhone by taking more control. The second article is purely factual about 
> >> the closing of the Honeycomb source code and makes no value judgements. 
> >> The first article is more interesting in that there are a number of levers 
> >> that Google uses to keep control of the platform that most Android users 
> >> are not even aware of.
> >> 
> >> Cheers,
> >> Carlo
> >> 
> >> On 2011-07-11, at 13:09, Rod Lavington wrote:
> >> 
> >>> Hi Carlo,
> >>> 
> >>> Have to take issue with the second article. Anyone that has followed 
> >>> Android through its many versions will understand why Google don't want 
> >>> to open up Honeycomb. Ice Cream Sandwich is on target to be released 
> >>> later on this year, that will reunite both the phone and tablet OS 
> >>> versions of Android (Gingerbread and Honeycomb). I'd say Google let a 
> >>> handful of top manufacturer's release Honeycomb tablets to keep Android 
> >>> out there, but will let everyone use Ice Cream Sandwich when available 
> >>> later on this year. And considering the woeful fragmentation over the 
> >>> different Android models, I can understand why Google wants to put the 
> >>> brakes on a bit!
> >>> 
> >>> I think HP with WebOS has the right mix of user interaction with code 
> >>> (through the Homebrewers) and keeping the rest of the code strictly HP 
> >>> only. No need for jailbreaking, and you can root the phone and unroot 
> >>> through the developers menu. Too bad nobody uses them ;)
> >>> 
> >>> Cheers
> >>> 
> >>> Rod!
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 12:49 PM, cm <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>> Hi Reg,
> >>> 
> >>> I think your son is wise to question. I am not sure of the connection 
> >>> between left wing and Android, but maybe your son would like to look at 
> >>> these articles about the control that Google exerts over the Android 
> >>> platform while loudly claiming that it is free and open.
> >>> 
> >>> http://www.asbigo.com/motorola/skyhook-filings-detail-googles-tight-control-of-android-platform/
> >>> 
> >>> http://www.businessinsider.com/google-honeycomb-open-2011-3
> >>> 
> >>> Cheers,
> >>> Carlo
> >>> 
> >>> On 2011-07-11, at 12:25, Reg Whitely wrote:
> >>> 
> >>>> Hi Paul
> >>>> 
> >>>> Reg Whitely
> >>>> 
> >>>> Home: 08 9921 7272
> >>>> Mob: 04 8899 7313
> >>>> Email: [email protected]
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>> On 11/07/2011, at 12:03 pm, Paul K wrote:
> >>>> 
> >>>>> I do understand that you did not intend to incite fear, just healthy
> >>>>> skepticism. A good thing. But I draw your attention to Reg's response:
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> "My son is keen to try it an good luck to him, and
> >>>>> I need to point out he has no association with WAMUG whatsoever, but in 
> >>>>> doing
> >>>>> so perhaps he's putting the rest of his family at risk."
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> I'm happy to be corrected by both Reg and you, however to me Reg
> >>>>> sounds a bit spooked.
> >>>> 
> >>>> Damien is a clever young man and is quite left wing when it comes to 
> >>>> multinationals and security 'terrorists'. Where possible he would use 
> >>>> android and linux!
> >>>> 
> >>>> I'm sure he will read the fine print. I brought him into the discussion 
> >>>> only because he has invited me to join Google+, and I'm not keen on it. 
> >>>> I am on Facebook and took a lot of time screwing down its security to 
> >>>> protect me and my family and friends as much as possible. 
> >>>> 
> >>>> I dislike Twitter and have no association with it, and a brief early 
> >>>> foray into Myspace still presents me with spurious young ladies wishing 
> >>>> to make my acquaintance - not!. 
> >>>> 
> >>>> Ronni's research came at just the right time for me to reassess this 
> >>>> situation.
> >>>> 
> >>>> This animated growth model of Facebook security is worth viewing. Note 
> >>>> it is current only to 2010:
> >>>> 
> >>>> http://mattmckeon.com/facebook-privacy/
> >>>> 
> >>>> Reg
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>>> If so, IMHO I believe that to be unwarranted.
> >>>>> As I said earlier if the end user perceives benefit as weighed against
> >>>>> the risk then a good thing has happened.
> >>>>> If it came across as a jab I apologise, it was only intended as a nudge 
> >>>>> :-)
> >>>>> Maybe what I could have said is; yes skepticism is a healthy thing but
> >>>>> you did not speculate much about the potential benefits just the
> >>>>> potential risks.
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> Regards
> >>>>> Paul
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> -- The WA Macintosh User Group Mailing List --
> >>>>> Archives - <http://www.wamug.org.au/mailinglist/archives.shtml>
> >>>>> Guidelines - <http://www.wamug.org.au/mailinglist/guidelines.shtml>
> >>>>> Unsubscribe - <mailto:[email protected]>
> >>>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>> -- The WA Macintosh User Group Mailing List --
> >>>> Archives - <http://www.wamug.org.au/mailinglist/archives.shtml>
> >>>> Guidelines - <http://www.wamug.org.au/mailinglist/guidelines.shtml>
> >>>> Unsubscribe - <mailto:[email protected]>
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> -- The WA Macintosh User Group Mailing List --
> >>> Archives - <http://www.wamug.org.au/mailinglist/archives.shtml>
> >>> Guidelines - <http://www.wamug.org.au/mailinglist/guidelines.shtml>
> >>> Unsubscribe - <mailto:[email protected]>
> >>> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> -- The WA Macintosh User Group Mailing List --
> >> Archives - <http://www.wamug.org.au/mailinglist/archives.shtml>
> >> Guidelines - <http://www.wamug.org.au/mailinglist/guidelines.shtml>
> >> Unsubscribe - <mailto:[email protected]>
> >> 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -- The WA Macintosh User Group Mailing List --
> > Archives - <http://www.wamug.org.au/mailinglist/archives.shtml>
> > Guidelines - <http://www.wamug.org.au/mailinglist/guidelines.shtml>
> > Unsubscribe - <mailto:[email protected]>
> > 




-- The WA Macintosh User Group Mailing List --
Archives - <http://www.wamug.org.au/mailinglist/archives.shtml>
Guidelines - <http://www.wamug.org.au/mailinglist/guidelines.shtml>
Unsubscribe - <mailto:[email protected]>