I see. So I guess that's what should be done. The entry should be renamed back to Google Wave and a new entry for Apache Wave (and Wave in a Box) should be created. I am not that familiar with the standards for creating Wiki entries, also, I personally would prefer to spend my spare time on actually creating patches for WIAB. So I thought that maybe some non technical community member would like to take on this (actually very important) task.
2011/8/10 Jérémy Naegel <[email protected]> > About this Apache Wave Wikipedia page : It was, up until a couple of > months, > the Google Wave page and it has simply been renamed Apache Wave. I think it > was a bad move, this page should have stayed the Google Wave page since > Google Wave is still an existing service, and a new Apache Wave page should > have been created from scratch since it's a fresh start for the product. I > think the renaming edit of the page should simply be undone, but I guess > this will trigger a debate among the contributors. > > - Jeremy > > > On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Dan Peterson <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Agreed -- go for it! > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Upayavira [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 04:33 AM > > To: [email protected] <[email protected]> > > Subject: Re: Update Wiki for Apache Wave > > > > I'd say just do it. If anyone wants to help, they will have an 'edit' > > button too. > > > > Upayavira > > > > On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 22:25 +0300, "Yuri Z" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I stumbled upon the Wiki page for Apache > > > Wave<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apache_Wave>- and my impression was > > > that it's of very low quality and conveys very > > > little information about Apache Wave and Wave in a Box project. Most of > > > the > > > information is related to Google Wave. I thought that it could be nice > > > to > > > discuss how we can improve /restructure the Wiki entry for Apache Wave. > > > > > >
