Suggestion made here : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Apache_Wave#Apache_Wave
- Jeremy On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 6:24 PM, Jérémy Naegel <[email protected]> wrote: > What I'm not familiar with is the Wikipedia revision / revocation of > changes policy... > > I'll try to suggest that change inside the discussion page and see if it > triggers any reaction. > After a few days without reactions or with positive reactions, I guess it > would be OK to change back the title. > > Then it will be possible to create a new "Apache Wave" entry (as it won't > be a duplicate). > I could start it, with the Apache Wave website definition and some general > infos, but I won't be able to add technical details. > > Btw, If someone whose mother tongue is English wants to help, that would be > much appreciated! > > - Jeremy > > > > On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 1:11 PM, Yuri Z <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I see. So I guess that's what should be done. The entry should be renamed >> back to Google Wave and a new entry for Apache Wave (and Wave in a Box) >> should be created. >> I am not that familiar with the standards for creating Wiki entries, also, >> I personally would prefer to spend my spare time on actually creating >> patches for WIAB. So I thought that maybe some non technical community >> member would like to take on this (actually very important) task. >> >> 2011/8/10 Jérémy Naegel <[email protected]> >> >> > About this Apache Wave Wikipedia page : It was, up until a couple of >> > months, >> > the Google Wave page and it has simply been renamed Apache Wave. I think >> it >> > was a bad move, this page should have stayed the Google Wave page since >> > Google Wave is still an existing service, and a new Apache Wave page >> should >> > have been created from scratch since it's a fresh start for the product. >> I >> > think the renaming edit of the page should simply be undone, but I guess >> > this will trigger a debate among the contributors. >> > >> > - Jeremy >> > >> > >> > On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Dan Peterson <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> > >> > > Agreed -- go for it! >> > > >> > > >> > > ----- Original Message ----- >> > > From: Upayavira [mailto:[email protected]] >> > > Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 04:33 AM >> > > To: [email protected] <[email protected]> >> > > Subject: Re: Update Wiki for Apache Wave >> > > >> > > I'd say just do it. If anyone wants to help, they will have an 'edit' >> > > button too. >> > > >> > > Upayavira >> > > >> > > On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 22:25 +0300, "Yuri Z" <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > > I stumbled upon the Wiki page for Apache >> > > > Wave<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apache_Wave>- and my impression >> was >> > > > that it's of very low quality and conveys very >> > > > little information about Apache Wave and Wave in a Box project. Most >> of >> > > > the >> > > > information is related to Google Wave. I thought that it could be >> nice >> > > > to >> > > > discuss how we can improve /restructure the Wiki entry for Apache >> Wave. >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > >
