Thanks for picking this up Thomas. You can open an issue in the Wave JIRA for this and assign it to yourself.
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Thomas Wrobel <[email protected]> wrote: > Seeing as I didn't have much luck picking apart the code, I could have > a go at this. At least to put more details in then there is now. > > Probably need checking over after I'm done for accuracy/missing > information. (and spelling...) > > Shall I sign up for the task? > > -Thomas Wrobel > > ~~~~~~ > Reviews of anything, by anyone; > www.rateoholic.co.uk > Please try out my new site and give feedback :) > > > > On 27 August 2011 14:09, Yuri Z <[email protected]> wrote: > > I think a good first step for creation Apache Wave Wiki page would be > fill > > in the "History" part of the "About Apache Wave" page at > > http://incubator.apache.org/wave/about.html. > > > > Currently the "History" contains the following TODO: "Lets summarize > Google > > Wave, Fed One, Wave in a Box, Apache Wave, the protocol, etc. It will be > > interesting to keep this information for people to understand how the > > project has evolved." > > > > Would be great of someone would take on the task to address this TODO. > > > > On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 8:41 AM, Yuri Z <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Great! Thanks for taking on this! > >> > >> > >> 2011/8/10 Jérémy Naegel <[email protected]> > >> > >>> Suggestion made here : > >>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Apache_Wave#Apache_Wave > >>> > >>> - Jeremy > >>> > >>> > >>> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 6:24 PM, Jérémy Naegel <[email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>> > What I'm not familiar with is the Wikipedia revision / revocation of > >>> > changes policy... > >>> > > >>> > I'll try to suggest that change inside the discussion page and see if > it > >>> > triggers any reaction. > >>> > After a few days without reactions or with positive reactions, I > guess > >>> it > >>> > would be OK to change back the title. > >>> > > >>> > Then it will be possible to create a new "Apache Wave" entry (as it > >>> won't > >>> > be a duplicate). > >>> > I could start it, with the Apache Wave website definition and some > >>> general > >>> > infos, but I won't be able to add technical details. > >>> > > >>> > Btw, If someone whose mother tongue is English wants to help, that > would > >>> be > >>> > much appreciated! > >>> > > >>> > - Jeremy > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 1:11 PM, Yuri Z <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > > >>> >> I see. So I guess that's what should be done. The entry should be > >>> renamed > >>> >> back to Google Wave and a new entry for Apache Wave (and Wave in a > Box) > >>> >> should be created. > >>> >> I am not that familiar with the standards for creating Wiki entries, > >>> also, > >>> >> I personally would prefer to spend my spare time on actually > creating > >>> >> patches for WIAB. So I thought that maybe some non technical > community > >>> >> member would like to take on this (actually very important) task. > >>> >> > >>> >> 2011/8/10 Jérémy Naegel <[email protected]> > >>> >> > >>> >> > About this Apache Wave Wikipedia page : It was, up until a couple > of > >>> >> > months, > >>> >> > the Google Wave page and it has simply been renamed Apache Wave. I > >>> think > >>> >> it > >>> >> > was a bad move, this page should have stayed the Google Wave page > >>> since > >>> >> > Google Wave is still an existing service, and a new Apache Wave > page > >>> >> should > >>> >> > have been created from scratch since it's a fresh start for the > >>> product. > >>> >> I > >>> >> > think the renaming edit of the page should simply be undone, but I > >>> guess > >>> >> > this will trigger a debate among the contributors. > >>> >> > > >>> >> > - Jeremy > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Dan Peterson < > [email protected] > >>> > > >>> >> > wrote: > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > Agreed -- go for it! > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > ----- Original Message ----- > >>> >> > > From: Upayavira [mailto:[email protected]] > >>> >> > > Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 04:33 AM > >>> >> > > To: [email protected] < > [email protected]> > >>> >> > > Subject: Re: Update Wiki for Apache Wave > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > I'd say just do it. If anyone wants to help, they will have an > >>> 'edit' > >>> >> > > button too. > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > Upayavira > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 22:25 +0300, "Yuri Z" <[email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>> >> > > > I stumbled upon the Wiki page for Apache > >>> >> > > > Wave<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apache_Wave>- and my > >>> impression > >>> >> was > >>> >> > > > that it's of very low quality and conveys very > >>> >> > > > little information about Apache Wave and Wave in a Box > project. > >>> Most > >>> >> of > >>> >> > > > the > >>> >> > > > information is related to Google Wave. I thought that it > could > >>> be > >>> >> nice > >>> >> > > > to > >>> >> > > > discuss how we can improve /restructure the Wiki entry for > Apache > >>> >> Wave. > >>> >> > > > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > >> > > >
