Seeing as I didn't have much luck picking apart the code, I could have a go at this. At least to put more details in then there is now.
Probably need checking over after I'm done for accuracy/missing information. (and spelling...) Shall I sign up for the task? -Thomas Wrobel ~~~~~~ Reviews of anything, by anyone; www.rateoholic.co.uk Please try out my new site and give feedback :) On 27 August 2011 14:09, Yuri Z <[email protected]> wrote: > I think a good first step for creation Apache Wave Wiki page would be fill > in the "History" part of the "About Apache Wave" page at > http://incubator.apache.org/wave/about.html. > > Currently the "History" contains the following TODO: "Lets summarize Google > Wave, Fed One, Wave in a Box, Apache Wave, the protocol, etc. It will be > interesting to keep this information for people to understand how the > project has evolved." > > Would be great of someone would take on the task to address this TODO. > > On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 8:41 AM, Yuri Z <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Great! Thanks for taking on this! >> >> >> 2011/8/10 Jérémy Naegel <[email protected]> >> >>> Suggestion made here : >>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Apache_Wave#Apache_Wave >>> >>> - Jeremy >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 6:24 PM, Jérémy Naegel <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> > What I'm not familiar with is the Wikipedia revision / revocation of >>> > changes policy... >>> > >>> > I'll try to suggest that change inside the discussion page and see if it >>> > triggers any reaction. >>> > After a few days without reactions or with positive reactions, I guess >>> it >>> > would be OK to change back the title. >>> > >>> > Then it will be possible to create a new "Apache Wave" entry (as it >>> won't >>> > be a duplicate). >>> > I could start it, with the Apache Wave website definition and some >>> general >>> > infos, but I won't be able to add technical details. >>> > >>> > Btw, If someone whose mother tongue is English wants to help, that would >>> be >>> > much appreciated! >>> > >>> > - Jeremy >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 1:11 PM, Yuri Z <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > >>> >> I see. So I guess that's what should be done. The entry should be >>> renamed >>> >> back to Google Wave and a new entry for Apache Wave (and Wave in a Box) >>> >> should be created. >>> >> I am not that familiar with the standards for creating Wiki entries, >>> also, >>> >> I personally would prefer to spend my spare time on actually creating >>> >> patches for WIAB. So I thought that maybe some non technical community >>> >> member would like to take on this (actually very important) task. >>> >> >>> >> 2011/8/10 Jérémy Naegel <[email protected]> >>> >> >>> >> > About this Apache Wave Wikipedia page : It was, up until a couple of >>> >> > months, >>> >> > the Google Wave page and it has simply been renamed Apache Wave. I >>> think >>> >> it >>> >> > was a bad move, this page should have stayed the Google Wave page >>> since >>> >> > Google Wave is still an existing service, and a new Apache Wave page >>> >> should >>> >> > have been created from scratch since it's a fresh start for the >>> product. >>> >> I >>> >> > think the renaming edit of the page should simply be undone, but I >>> guess >>> >> > this will trigger a debate among the contributors. >>> >> > >>> >> > - Jeremy >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Dan Peterson <[email protected] >>> > >>> >> > wrote: >>> >> > >>> >> > > Agreed -- go for it! >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > ----- Original Message ----- >>> >> > > From: Upayavira [mailto:[email protected]] >>> >> > > Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 04:33 AM >>> >> > > To: [email protected] <[email protected]> >>> >> > > Subject: Re: Update Wiki for Apache Wave >>> >> > > >>> >> > > I'd say just do it. If anyone wants to help, they will have an >>> 'edit' >>> >> > > button too. >>> >> > > >>> >> > > Upayavira >>> >> > > >>> >> > > On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 22:25 +0300, "Yuri Z" <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >> > > > I stumbled upon the Wiki page for Apache >>> >> > > > Wave<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apache_Wave>- and my >>> impression >>> >> was >>> >> > > > that it's of very low quality and conveys very >>> >> > > > little information about Apache Wave and Wave in a Box project. >>> Most >>> >> of >>> >> > > > the >>> >> > > > information is related to Google Wave. I thought that it could >>> be >>> >> nice >>> >> > > > to >>> >> > > > discuss how we can improve /restructure the Wiki entry for Apache >>> >> Wave. >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > >>> >> >>> > >>> > >>> >> >
