Great! Thanks for taking on this! 2011/8/10 Jérémy Naegel <jeremy....@gmail.com>
> Suggestion made here : > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Apache_Wave#Apache_Wave > > - Jeremy > > > On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 6:24 PM, Jérémy Naegel <jeremy....@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > What I'm not familiar with is the Wikipedia revision / revocation of > > changes policy... > > > > I'll try to suggest that change inside the discussion page and see if it > > triggers any reaction. > > After a few days without reactions or with positive reactions, I guess it > > would be OK to change back the title. > > > > Then it will be possible to create a new "Apache Wave" entry (as it won't > > be a duplicate). > > I could start it, with the Apache Wave website definition and some > general > > infos, but I won't be able to add technical details. > > > > Btw, If someone whose mother tongue is English wants to help, that would > be > > much appreciated! > > > > - Jeremy > > > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 1:11 PM, Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> I see. So I guess that's what should be done. The entry should be > renamed > >> back to Google Wave and a new entry for Apache Wave (and Wave in a Box) > >> should be created. > >> I am not that familiar with the standards for creating Wiki entries, > also, > >> I personally would prefer to spend my spare time on actually creating > >> patches for WIAB. So I thought that maybe some non technical community > >> member would like to take on this (actually very important) task. > >> > >> 2011/8/10 Jérémy Naegel <jeremy....@gmail.com> > >> > >> > About this Apache Wave Wikipedia page : It was, up until a couple of > >> > months, > >> > the Google Wave page and it has simply been renamed Apache Wave. I > think > >> it > >> > was a bad move, this page should have stayed the Google Wave page > since > >> > Google Wave is still an existing service, and a new Apache Wave page > >> should > >> > have been created from scratch since it's a fresh start for the > product. > >> I > >> > think the renaming edit of the page should simply be undone, but I > guess > >> > this will trigger a debate among the contributors. > >> > > >> > - Jeremy > >> > > >> > > >> > On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Dan Peterson <dpeter...@google.com> > >> > wrote: > >> > > >> > > Agreed -- go for it! > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > ----- Original Message ----- > >> > > From: Upayavira [mailto:u...@odoko.co.uk] > >> > > Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 04:33 AM > >> > > To: wave-dev@incubator.apache.org <wave-dev@incubator.apache.org> > >> > > Subject: Re: Update Wiki for Apache Wave > >> > > > >> > > I'd say just do it. If anyone wants to help, they will have an > 'edit' > >> > > button too. > >> > > > >> > > Upayavira > >> > > > >> > > On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 22:25 +0300, "Yuri Z" <vega...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > > > I stumbled upon the Wiki page for Apache > >> > > > Wave<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apache_Wave>- and my impression > >> was > >> > > > that it's of very low quality and conveys very > >> > > > little information about Apache Wave and Wave in a Box project. > Most > >> of > >> > > > the > >> > > > information is related to Google Wave. I thought that it could be > >> nice > >> > > > to > >> > > > discuss how we can improve /restructure the Wiki entry for Apache > >> Wave. > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > > >
