Would this do as the task; https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WAVE-290
On 29 August 2011 15:50, Paul Thomas <[email protected]> wrote: > Epic? WAIB goes under there. > > > > ________________________________ > From: Thomas Wrobel <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Mon, 29 August, 2011 14:30:16 > Subject: Re: Update Wiki for Apache Wave > > Sure...should I categorise this as just a "TASK" or maybe a > "STORY".....kinda new to all this so not sure what category this issue > would fall under. (I dread to think what gets put under "EPIC" !) > > -Thomas > > ~~~~~~ > Reviews of anything, by anyone; > www.rateoholic.co.uk > Please try out my new site and give feedback :) > > > > On 29 August 2011 14:44, Yuri Z <[email protected]> wrote: >> Thanks for picking this up Thomas. You can open an issue in the Wave JIRA >> for this and assign it to yourself. >> >> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Thomas Wrobel <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Seeing as I didn't have much luck picking apart the code, I could have >>> a go at this. At least to put more details in then there is now. >>> >>> Probably need checking over after I'm done for accuracy/missing >>> information. (and spelling...) >>> >>> Shall I sign up for the task? >>> >>> -Thomas Wrobel >>> >>> ~~~~~~ >>> Reviews of anything, by anyone; >>> www.rateoholic.co.uk >>> Please try out my new site and give feedback :) >>> >>> >>> >>> On 27 August 2011 14:09, Yuri Z <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > I think a good first step for creation Apache Wave Wiki page would be >>> fill >>> > in the "History" part of the "About Apache Wave" page at >>> > http://incubator.apache.org/wave/about.html. >>> > >>> > Currently the "History" contains the following TODO: "Lets summarize >>> Google >>> > Wave, Fed One, Wave in a Box, Apache Wave, the protocol, etc. It will be >>> > interesting to keep this information for people to understand how the >>> > project has evolved." >>> > >>> > Would be great of someone would take on the task to address this TODO. >>> > >>> > On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 8:41 AM, Yuri Z <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > >>> >> Great! Thanks for taking on this! >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> 2011/8/10 Jérémy Naegel <[email protected]> >>> >> >>> >>> Suggestion made here : >>> >>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Apache_Wave#Apache_Wave >>> >>> >>> >>> - Jeremy >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 6:24 PM, Jérémy Naegel <[email protected]> >>> >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> > What I'm not familiar with is the Wikipedia revision / revocation of >>> >>> > changes policy... >>> >>> > >>> >>> > I'll try to suggest that change inside the discussion page and see if >>> it >>> >>> > triggers any reaction. >>> >>> > After a few days without reactions or with positive reactions, I >>> guess >>> >>> it >>> >>> > would be OK to change back the title. >>> >>> > >>> >>> > Then it will be possible to create a new "Apache Wave" entry (as it >>> >>> won't >>> >>> > be a duplicate). >>> >>> > I could start it, with the Apache Wave website definition and some >>> >>> general >>> >>> > infos, but I won't be able to add technical details. >>> >>> > >>> >>> > Btw, If someone whose mother tongue is English wants to help, that >>> would >>> >>> be >>> >>> > much appreciated! >>> >>> > >>> >>> > - Jeremy >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> > On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 1:11 PM, Yuri Z <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> > >>> >>> >> I see. So I guess that's what should be done. The entry should be >>> >>> renamed >>> >>> >> back to Google Wave and a new entry for Apache Wave (and Wave in a >>> Box) >>> >>> >> should be created. >>> >>> >> I am not that familiar with the standards for creating Wiki entries, >>> >>> also, >>> >>> >> I personally would prefer to spend my spare time on actually >>> creating >>> >>> >> patches for WIAB. So I thought that maybe some non technical >>> community >>> >>> >> member would like to take on this (actually very important) task. >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> 2011/8/10 Jérémy Naegel <[email protected]> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > About this Apache Wave Wikipedia page : It was, up until a couple >>> of >>> >>> >> > months, >>> >>> >> > the Google Wave page and it has simply been renamed Apache Wave. I >>> >>> think >>> >>> >> it >>> >>> >> > was a bad move, this page should have stayed the Google Wave page >>> >>> since >>> >>> >> > Google Wave is still an existing service, and a new Apache Wave >>> page >>> >>> >> should >>> >>> >> > have been created from scratch since it's a fresh start for the >>> >>> product. >>> >>> >> I >>> >>> >> > think the renaming edit of the page should simply be undone, but I >>> >>> guess >>> >>> >> > this will trigger a debate among the contributors. >>> >>> >> > >>> >>> >> > - Jeremy >>> >>> >> > >>> >>> >> > >>> >>> >> > On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Dan Peterson < >>> [email protected] >>> >>> > >>> >>> >> > wrote: >>> >>> >> > >>> >>> >> > > Agreed -- go for it! >>> >>> >> > > >>> >>> >> > > >>> >>> >> > > ----- Original Message ----- >>> >>> >> > > From: Upayavira [mailto:[email protected]] >>> >>> >> > > Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 04:33 AM >>> >>> >> > > To: [email protected] < >>> [email protected]> >>> >>> >> > > Subject: Re: Update Wiki for Apache Wave >>> >>> >> > > >>> >>> >> > > I'd say just do it. If anyone wants to help, they will have an >>> >>> 'edit' >>> >>> >> > > button too. >>> >>> >> > > >>> >>> >> > > Upayavira >>> >>> >> > > >>> >>> >> > > On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 22:25 +0300, "Yuri Z" <[email protected]> >>> >>> wrote: >>> >>> >> > > > I stumbled upon the Wiki page for Apache >>> >>> >> > > > Wave<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apache_Wave>- and my >>> >>> impression >>> >>> >> was >>> >>> >> > > > that it's of very low quality and conveys very >>> >>> >> > > > little information about Apache Wave and Wave in a Box >>> project. >>> >>> Most >>> >>> >> of >>> >>> >> > > > the >>> >>> >> > > > information is related to Google Wave. I thought that it >>> could >>> >>> be >>> >>> >> nice >>> >>> >> > > > to >>> >>> >> > > > discuss how we can improve /restructure the Wiki entry for >>> Apache >>> >>> >> Wave. >>> >>> >> > > > >>> >>> >> > > >>> >>> >> > >>> >>> >> >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> >>> >> >>> > >>> >> >
