I published the wave history, please review at http://incubator.apache.org/wave/about.html. Thanks for the effort Thomas. Well actually there are more tasks related to documentation:
1. Wiki page. Currently Apache Wave doesn't have its own entry at Wikipedia and instead it is linked to the entry for Google Wave. We should rename the current entry back to Google Wave and create a new one for Apache Wave. Actually Jeremy already posted on the discussions page to make the changed. IMO so far no one objected, so I guess we can just do the change. 2. Documentation migration from wave-protocol site. There's a lot of documentation at the old http://www.waveprotocol.org/. We can start by compiling a list with with links and posting them on Apache Wave wiki. On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 2:29 PM, Thomas Wrobel <darkfl...@gmail.com> wrote: > Still haven't got any corrections on this so is it considered "done" ? > > If theres any other tasks like this let me know, as I want to do what I can > to help this project. > > -Thomas > > > ~~~~~~ > Reviews of anything, by anyone; > www.rateoholic.co.uk > Please try out my new site and give feedback :) > > > On 2 September 2011 22:55, Thomas Wrobel <darkfl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > ah, cheers for that. > > I'll get to the changes over the next week ) > > > > ~~~~~~ > > Reviews of anything, by anyone; > > www.rateoholic.co.uk > > Please try out my new site and give feedback :) > > > > > > > > On 31 August 2011 11:49, Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Yeah, that's what I intended to say. I think that Google Wave is better > > > suited for collaboration on a document than Google Docs. > > > Actually I already did it - copied the contents of the doc created by > > Thomas > > > into a wave and made it public. The wave can be found at: > > > > > > https://wave.google.com/wave/waveref/googlewave.com/w+EzBfK0s1A/~/conv+root/b+EzBfK0s1B > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 11:00 PM, Zachary “Gamer_Z.” Yaro > > > <zmy...@gmail.com>wrote: > > > > > >> By "Google Wave" I think he meant wave.google.com, which, at the > > moment, > > >> is > > >> a bit more stable and reliable than WIAB (no offense to Yuri's setup). > > >> > > >> --Zachary “Gamer_Z.” Yaro > > >> > > >> > > >> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 15:56, Thomas Wrobel <darkfl...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > >> > > >> > You mean at; > > >> > http://waveinabox.net/ > > >> > I thought of that , but I cant seem to load it. > > >> > > > >> > "A turbulence detected! > > >> > > > >> > Please save your last changes to somewhere and reload the wave." > > >> > > > >> > (starts as soon as a load - Chrome 14.0.835.109 beta-m. Doesn't > work > > >> > on the Beta of chrome?) > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > On 29 August 2011 19:42, Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> > > Great work Thomas, thanks! > > >> > > Just one suggestion - can we move the discussion to Google Wave? > > >> > > > > >> > > On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 8:35 PM, Thomas Wrobel < > darkfl...@gmail.com > > > > > >> > wrote: > > >> > > > > >> > >> I wrote a early draft here; > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > > > >> > > > https://docs.google.com/document/pub?id=14AbilsPE6NRTwBildiTtSQ4I5T3Is7lbmgHnUt95lMc > > >> > >> > > >> > >> Let me know if I am going along the right lines, and I'll > > correct/add > > >> > >> to based on feedback. > > >> > >> > > >> > >> -Thomas > > >> > >> > > >> > >> ~~~~~~ > > >> > >> Reviews of anything, by anyone; > > >> > >> www.rateoholic.co.uk > > >> > >> Please try out my new site and give feedback :) > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> On 29 August 2011 17:16, Michael MacFadden < > > >> michael.macfad...@gmail.com > > >> > > > > >> > >> wrote: > > >> > >> > done. > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > On Aug 29, 2011, at 7:16 AM, Yuri Z wrote: > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> >> @Michael, Can you please add Thomas to contributors so he > would > > be > > >> > able > > >> > >> to assign the JIRA task to himself? > > >> > >> >> > > >> > >> >> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 5:14 PM, Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > >> > >> >> Yeah :) Thanks > > >> > >> >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> > >> >> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Thomas Wrobel < > > >> darkfl...@gmail.com> > > >> > >> wrote: > > >> > >> >> Would this do as the task; > > >> > >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WAVE-290 > > >> > >> >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> > >> >> On 29 August 2011 15:50, Paul Thomas <dt01pqt...@yahoo.com> > > wrote: > > >> > >> >> > Epic? WAIB goes under there. > > >> > >> >> > > > >> > >> >> > > > >> > >> >> > > > >> > >> >> > ________________________________ > > >> > >> >> > From: Thomas Wrobel <darkfl...@gmail.com> > > >> > >> >> > To: wave-dev@incubator.apache.org > > >> > >> >> > Sent: Mon, 29 August, 2011 14:30:16 > > >> > >> >> > Subject: Re: Update Wiki for Apache Wave > > >> > >> >> > > > >> > >> >> > Sure...should I categorise this as just a "TASK" or maybe a > > >> > >> >> > "STORY".....kinda new to all this so not sure what category > > this > > >> > issue > > >> > >> >> > would fall under. (I dread to think what gets put under > "EPIC" > > !) > > >> > >> >> > > > >> > >> >> > -Thomas > > >> > >> >> > > > >> > >> >> > ~~~~~~ > > >> > >> >> > Reviews of anything, by anyone; > > >> > >> >> > www.rateoholic.co.uk > > >> > >> >> > Please try out my new site and give feedback :) > > >> > >> >> > > > >> > >> >> > > > >> > >> >> > > > >> > >> >> > On 29 August 2011 14:44, Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> > >> >> >> Thanks for picking this up Thomas. You can open an issue in > > the > > >> > Wave > > >> > >> JIRA > > >> > >> >> >> for this and assign it to yourself. > > >> > >> >> >> > > >> > >> >> >> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Thomas Wrobel < > > >> > darkfl...@gmail.com> > > >> > >> wrote: > > >> > >> >> >> > > >> > >> >> >>> Seeing as I didn't have much luck picking apart the code, > I > > >> could > > >> > >> have > > >> > >> >> >>> a go at this. At least to put more details in then there > is > > >> now. > > >> > >> >> >>> > > >> > >> >> >>> Probably need checking over after I'm done for > > accuracy/missing > > >> > >> >> >>> information. (and spelling...) > > >> > >> >> >>> > > >> > >> >> >>> Shall I sign up for the task? > > >> > >> >> >>> > > >> > >> >> >>> -Thomas Wrobel > > >> > >> >> >>> > > >> > >> >> >>> ~~~~~~ > > >> > >> >> >>> Reviews of anything, by anyone; > > >> > >> >> >>> www.rateoholic.co.uk > > >> > >> >> >>> Please try out my new site and give feedback :) > > >> > >> >> >>> > > >> > >> >> >>> > > >> > >> >> >>> > > >> > >> >> >>> On 27 August 2011 14:09, Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > >> > >> >> >>> > I think a good first step for creation Apache Wave Wiki > > page > > >> > would > > >> > >> be > > >> > >> >> >>> fill > > >> > >> >> >>> > in the "History" part of the "About Apache Wave" page at > > >> > >> >> >>> > http://incubator.apache.org/wave/about.html. > > >> > >> >> >>> > > > >> > >> >> >>> > Currently the "History" contains the following TODO: > "Lets > > >> > >> summarize > > >> > >> >> >>> Google > > >> > >> >> >>> > Wave, Fed One, Wave in a Box, Apache Wave, the protocol, > > etc. > > >> > It > > >> > >> will be > > >> > >> >> >>> > interesting to keep this information for people to > > understand > > >> > how > > >> > >> the > > >> > >> >> >>> > project has evolved." > > >> > >> >> >>> > > > >> > >> >> >>> > Would be great of someone would take on the task to > > address > > >> > this > > >> > >> TODO. > > >> > >> >> >>> > > > >> > >> >> >>> > On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 8:41 AM, Yuri Z < > > vega...@gmail.com> > > >> > >> wrote: > > >> > >> >> >>> > > > >> > >> >> >>> >> Great! Thanks for taking on this! > > >> > >> >> >>> >> > > >> > >> >> >>> >> > > >> > >> >> >>> >> 2011/8/10 Jérémy Naegel <jeremy....@gmail.com> > > >> > >> >> >>> >> > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> Suggestion made here : > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Apache_Wave#Apache_Wave > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> - Jeremy > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 6:24 PM, Jérémy Naegel < > > >> > >> jeremy....@gmail.com> > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> wrote: > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> > What I'm not familiar with is the Wikipedia revision > / > > >> > >> revocation of > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> > changes policy... > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> > > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> > I'll try to suggest that change inside the > discussion > > >> page > > >> > and > > >> > >> see if > > >> > >> >> >>> it > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> > triggers any reaction. > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> > After a few days without reactions or with positive > > >> > reactions, > > >> > >> I > > >> > >> >> >>> guess > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> it > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> > would be OK to change back the title. > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> > > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> > Then it will be possible to create a new "Apache > Wave" > > >> > entry > > >> > >> (as it > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> won't > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> > be a duplicate). > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> > I could start it, with the Apache Wave website > > definition > > >> > and > > >> > >> some > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> general > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> > infos, but I won't be able to add technical details. > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> > > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> > Btw, If someone whose mother tongue is English wants > > to > > >> > help, > > >> > >> that > > >> > >> >> >>> would > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> be > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> > much appreciated! > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> > > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> > - Jeremy > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> > > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> > > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> > > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> > On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 1:11 PM, Yuri Z < > > >> vega...@gmail.com > > >> > > > > >> > >> wrote: > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> > > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> I see. So I guess that's what should be done. The > > entry > > >> > >> should be > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> renamed > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> back to Google Wave and a new entry for Apache Wave > > (and > > >> > Wave > > >> > >> in a > > >> > >> >> >>> Box) > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> should be created. > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> I am not that familiar with the standards for > > creating > > >> > Wiki > > >> > >> entries, > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> also, > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> I personally would prefer to spend my spare time > on > > >> > actually > > >> > >> >> >>> creating > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> patches for WIAB. So I thought that maybe some non > > >> > technical > > >> > >> >> >>> community > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> member would like to take on this (actually very > > >> > important) > > >> > >> task. > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> 2011/8/10 Jérémy Naegel <jeremy....@gmail.com> > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > About this Apache Wave Wikipedia page : It was, > up > > >> until > > >> > a > > >> > >> couple > > >> > >> >> >>> of > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > months, > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > the Google Wave page and it has simply been > renamed > > >> > Apache > > >> > >> Wave. I > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> think > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> it > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > was a bad move, this page should have stayed the > > >> Google > > >> > >> Wave page > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> since > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > Google Wave is still an existing service, and a > new > > >> > Apache > > >> > >> Wave > > >> > >> >> >>> page > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> should > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > have been created from scratch since it's a fresh > > >> start > > >> > for > > >> > >> the > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> product. > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> I > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > think the renaming edit of the page should simply > > be > > >> > >> undone, but I > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> guess > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > this will trigger a debate among the > contributors. > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > - Jeremy > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Dan Peterson < > > >> > >> >> >>> dpeter...@google.com > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> > > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > wrote: > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > > Agreed -- go for it! > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > > > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > > > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > > ----- Original Message ----- > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > > From: Upayavira [mailto:u...@odoko.co.uk] > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > > Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 04:33 AM > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > > To: wave-dev@incubator.apache.org < > > >> > >> >> >>> wave-dev@incubator.apache.org> > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > > Subject: Re: Update Wiki for Apache Wave > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > > > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > > I'd say just do it. If anyone wants to help, > they > > >> will > > >> > >> have an > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> 'edit' > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > > button too. > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > > > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > > Upayavira > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > > > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > > On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 22:25 +0300, "Yuri Z" < > > >> > >> vega...@gmail.com> > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> wrote: > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > > > I stumbled upon the Wiki page for Apache > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > > > Wave< > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apache_Wave > > >- > > >> and > > >> > my > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> impression > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> was > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > > > that it's of very low quality and conveys > very > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > > > little information about Apache Wave and Wave > > in a > > >> > Box > > >> > >> >> >>> project. > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> Most > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> of > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > > > the > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > > > information is related to Google Wave. I > > thought > > >> > that > > >> > >> it > > >> > >> >> >>> could > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> be > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> nice > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > > > to > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > > > discuss how we can improve /restructure the > > Wiki > > >> > entry > > >> > >> for > > >> > >> >> >>> Apache > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> Wave. > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > > > > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > > > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> > > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> > > > >> > >> >> >>> >>> > > >> > >> >> >>> >> > > >> > >> >> >>> > > > >> > >> >> >>> > > >> > >> >> >> > > >> > >> >> > > > >> > >> >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >
