Yeah :) Thanks On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Thomas Wrobel <[email protected]> wrote:
> Would this do as the task; > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WAVE-290 > > > On 29 August 2011 15:50, Paul Thomas <[email protected]> wrote: > > Epic? WAIB goes under there. > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > From: Thomas Wrobel <[email protected]> > > To: [email protected] > > Sent: Mon, 29 August, 2011 14:30:16 > > Subject: Re: Update Wiki for Apache Wave > > > > Sure...should I categorise this as just a "TASK" or maybe a > > "STORY".....kinda new to all this so not sure what category this issue > > would fall under. (I dread to think what gets put under "EPIC" !) > > > > -Thomas > > > > ~~~~~~ > > Reviews of anything, by anyone; > > www.rateoholic.co.uk > > Please try out my new site and give feedback :) > > > > > > > > On 29 August 2011 14:44, Yuri Z <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Thanks for picking this up Thomas. You can open an issue in the Wave > JIRA > >> for this and assign it to yourself. > >> > >> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Thomas Wrobel <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >>> Seeing as I didn't have much luck picking apart the code, I could have > >>> a go at this. At least to put more details in then there is now. > >>> > >>> Probably need checking over after I'm done for accuracy/missing > >>> information. (and spelling...) > >>> > >>> Shall I sign up for the task? > >>> > >>> -Thomas Wrobel > >>> > >>> ~~~~~~ > >>> Reviews of anything, by anyone; > >>> www.rateoholic.co.uk > >>> Please try out my new site and give feedback :) > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On 27 August 2011 14:09, Yuri Z <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > I think a good first step for creation Apache Wave Wiki page would be > >>> fill > >>> > in the "History" part of the "About Apache Wave" page at > >>> > http://incubator.apache.org/wave/about.html. > >>> > > >>> > Currently the "History" contains the following TODO: "Lets summarize > >>> Google > >>> > Wave, Fed One, Wave in a Box, Apache Wave, the protocol, etc. It will > be > >>> > interesting to keep this information for people to understand how the > >>> > project has evolved." > >>> > > >>> > Would be great of someone would take on the task to address this > TODO. > >>> > > >>> > On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 8:41 AM, Yuri Z <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > > >>> >> Great! Thanks for taking on this! > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> 2011/8/10 Jérémy Naegel <[email protected]> > >>> >> > >>> >>> Suggestion made here : > >>> >>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Apache_Wave#Apache_Wave > >>> >>> > >>> >>> - Jeremy > >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 6:24 PM, Jérémy Naegel < > [email protected]> > >>> >>> wrote: > >>> >>> > >>> >>> > What I'm not familiar with is the Wikipedia revision / revocation > of > >>> >>> > changes policy... > >>> >>> > > >>> >>> > I'll try to suggest that change inside the discussion page and > see if > >>> it > >>> >>> > triggers any reaction. > >>> >>> > After a few days without reactions or with positive reactions, I > >>> guess > >>> >>> it > >>> >>> > would be OK to change back the title. > >>> >>> > > >>> >>> > Then it will be possible to create a new "Apache Wave" entry (as > it > >>> >>> won't > >>> >>> > be a duplicate). > >>> >>> > I could start it, with the Apache Wave website definition and > some > >>> >>> general > >>> >>> > infos, but I won't be able to add technical details. > >>> >>> > > >>> >>> > Btw, If someone whose mother tongue is English wants to help, > that > >>> would > >>> >>> be > >>> >>> > much appreciated! > >>> >>> > > >>> >>> > - Jeremy > >>> >>> > > >>> >>> > > >>> >>> > > >>> >>> > On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 1:11 PM, Yuri Z <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> >>> > > >>> >>> >> I see. So I guess that's what should be done. The entry should > be > >>> >>> renamed > >>> >>> >> back to Google Wave and a new entry for Apache Wave (and Wave in > a > >>> Box) > >>> >>> >> should be created. > >>> >>> >> I am not that familiar with the standards for creating Wiki > entries, > >>> >>> also, > >>> >>> >> I personally would prefer to spend my spare time on actually > >>> creating > >>> >>> >> patches for WIAB. So I thought that maybe some non technical > >>> community > >>> >>> >> member would like to take on this (actually very important) > task. > >>> >>> >> > >>> >>> >> 2011/8/10 Jérémy Naegel <[email protected]> > >>> >>> >> > >>> >>> >> > About this Apache Wave Wikipedia page : It was, up until a > couple > >>> of > >>> >>> >> > months, > >>> >>> >> > the Google Wave page and it has simply been renamed Apache > Wave. I > >>> >>> think > >>> >>> >> it > >>> >>> >> > was a bad move, this page should have stayed the Google Wave > page > >>> >>> since > >>> >>> >> > Google Wave is still an existing service, and a new Apache > Wave > >>> page > >>> >>> >> should > >>> >>> >> > have been created from scratch since it's a fresh start for > the > >>> >>> product. > >>> >>> >> I > >>> >>> >> > think the renaming edit of the page should simply be undone, > but I > >>> >>> guess > >>> >>> >> > this will trigger a debate among the contributors. > >>> >>> >> > > >>> >>> >> > - Jeremy > >>> >>> >> > > >>> >>> >> > > >>> >>> >> > On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Dan Peterson < > >>> [email protected] > >>> >>> > > >>> >>> >> > wrote: > >>> >>> >> > > >>> >>> >> > > Agreed -- go for it! > >>> >>> >> > > > >>> >>> >> > > > >>> >>> >> > > ----- Original Message ----- > >>> >>> >> > > From: Upayavira [mailto:[email protected]] > >>> >>> >> > > Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 04:33 AM > >>> >>> >> > > To: [email protected] < > >>> [email protected]> > >>> >>> >> > > Subject: Re: Update Wiki for Apache Wave > >>> >>> >> > > > >>> >>> >> > > I'd say just do it. If anyone wants to help, they will have > an > >>> >>> 'edit' > >>> >>> >> > > button too. > >>> >>> >> > > > >>> >>> >> > > Upayavira > >>> >>> >> > > > >>> >>> >> > > On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 22:25 +0300, "Yuri Z" < > [email protected]> > >>> >>> wrote: > >>> >>> >> > > > I stumbled upon the Wiki page for Apache > >>> >>> >> > > > Wave<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apache_Wave>- and my > >>> >>> impression > >>> >>> >> was > >>> >>> >> > > > that it's of very low quality and conveys very > >>> >>> >> > > > little information about Apache Wave and Wave in a Box > >>> project. > >>> >>> Most > >>> >>> >> of > >>> >>> >> > > > the > >>> >>> >> > > > information is related to Google Wave. I thought that it > >>> could > >>> >>> be > >>> >>> >> nice > >>> >>> >> > > > to > >>> >>> >> > > > discuss how we can improve /restructure the Wiki entry for > >>> Apache > >>> >>> >> Wave. > >>> >>> >> > > > > >>> >>> >> > > > >>> >>> >> > > >>> >>> >> > >>> >>> > > >>> >>> > > >>> >>> > >>> >> > >>> > > >>> > >> > > >
