Great work Thomas, thanks! Just one suggestion - can we move the discussion to Google Wave?
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 8:35 PM, Thomas Wrobel <[email protected]> wrote: > I wrote a early draft here; > > https://docs.google.com/document/pub?id=14AbilsPE6NRTwBildiTtSQ4I5T3Is7lbmgHnUt95lMc > > Let me know if I am going along the right lines, and I'll correct/add > to based on feedback. > > -Thomas > > ~~~~~~ > Reviews of anything, by anyone; > www.rateoholic.co.uk > Please try out my new site and give feedback :) > > > > On 29 August 2011 17:16, Michael MacFadden <[email protected]> > wrote: > > done. > > > > > > On Aug 29, 2011, at 7:16 AM, Yuri Z wrote: > > > >> @Michael, Can you please add Thomas to contributors so he would be able > to assign the JIRA task to himself? > >> > >> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 5:14 PM, Yuri Z <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Yeah :) Thanks > >> > >> > >> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Thomas Wrobel <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Would this do as the task; > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WAVE-290 > >> > >> > >> On 29 August 2011 15:50, Paul Thomas <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > Epic? WAIB goes under there. > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > ________________________________ > >> > From: Thomas Wrobel <[email protected]> > >> > To: [email protected] > >> > Sent: Mon, 29 August, 2011 14:30:16 > >> > Subject: Re: Update Wiki for Apache Wave > >> > > >> > Sure...should I categorise this as just a "TASK" or maybe a > >> > "STORY".....kinda new to all this so not sure what category this issue > >> > would fall under. (I dread to think what gets put under "EPIC" !) > >> > > >> > -Thomas > >> > > >> > ~~~~~~ > >> > Reviews of anything, by anyone; > >> > www.rateoholic.co.uk > >> > Please try out my new site and give feedback :) > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > On 29 August 2011 14:44, Yuri Z <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> Thanks for picking this up Thomas. You can open an issue in the Wave > JIRA > >> >> for this and assign it to yourself. > >> >> > >> >> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Thomas Wrobel <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> >> > >> >>> Seeing as I didn't have much luck picking apart the code, I could > have > >> >>> a go at this. At least to put more details in then there is now. > >> >>> > >> >>> Probably need checking over after I'm done for accuracy/missing > >> >>> information. (and spelling...) > >> >>> > >> >>> Shall I sign up for the task? > >> >>> > >> >>> -Thomas Wrobel > >> >>> > >> >>> ~~~~~~ > >> >>> Reviews of anything, by anyone; > >> >>> www.rateoholic.co.uk > >> >>> Please try out my new site and give feedback :) > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> On 27 August 2011 14:09, Yuri Z <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >>> > I think a good first step for creation Apache Wave Wiki page would > be > >> >>> fill > >> >>> > in the "History" part of the "About Apache Wave" page at > >> >>> > http://incubator.apache.org/wave/about.html. > >> >>> > > >> >>> > Currently the "History" contains the following TODO: "Lets > summarize > >> >>> Google > >> >>> > Wave, Fed One, Wave in a Box, Apache Wave, the protocol, etc. It > will be > >> >>> > interesting to keep this information for people to understand how > the > >> >>> > project has evolved." > >> >>> > > >> >>> > Would be great of someone would take on the task to address this > TODO. > >> >>> > > >> >>> > On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 8:41 AM, Yuri Z <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> >>> > > >> >>> >> Great! Thanks for taking on this! > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> 2011/8/10 Jérémy Naegel <[email protected]> > >> >>> >> > >> >>> >>> Suggestion made here : > >> >>> >>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Apache_Wave#Apache_Wave > >> >>> >>> > >> >>> >>> - Jeremy > >> >>> >>> > >> >>> >>> > >> >>> >>> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 6:24 PM, Jérémy Naegel < > [email protected]> > >> >>> >>> wrote: > >> >>> >>> > >> >>> >>> > What I'm not familiar with is the Wikipedia revision / > revocation of > >> >>> >>> > changes policy... > >> >>> >>> > > >> >>> >>> > I'll try to suggest that change inside the discussion page and > see if > >> >>> it > >> >>> >>> > triggers any reaction. > >> >>> >>> > After a few days without reactions or with positive reactions, > I > >> >>> guess > >> >>> >>> it > >> >>> >>> > would be OK to change back the title. > >> >>> >>> > > >> >>> >>> > Then it will be possible to create a new "Apache Wave" entry > (as it > >> >>> >>> won't > >> >>> >>> > be a duplicate). > >> >>> >>> > I could start it, with the Apache Wave website definition and > some > >> >>> >>> general > >> >>> >>> > infos, but I won't be able to add technical details. > >> >>> >>> > > >> >>> >>> > Btw, If someone whose mother tongue is English wants to help, > that > >> >>> would > >> >>> >>> be > >> >>> >>> > much appreciated! > >> >>> >>> > > >> >>> >>> > - Jeremy > >> >>> >>> > > >> >>> >>> > > >> >>> >>> > > >> >>> >>> > On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 1:11 PM, Yuri Z <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> >>> >>> > > >> >>> >>> >> I see. So I guess that's what should be done. The entry > should be > >> >>> >>> renamed > >> >>> >>> >> back to Google Wave and a new entry for Apache Wave (and Wave > in a > >> >>> Box) > >> >>> >>> >> should be created. > >> >>> >>> >> I am not that familiar with the standards for creating Wiki > entries, > >> >>> >>> also, > >> >>> >>> >> I personally would prefer to spend my spare time on actually > >> >>> creating > >> >>> >>> >> patches for WIAB. So I thought that maybe some non technical > >> >>> community > >> >>> >>> >> member would like to take on this (actually very important) > task. > >> >>> >>> >> > >> >>> >>> >> 2011/8/10 Jérémy Naegel <[email protected]> > >> >>> >>> >> > >> >>> >>> >> > About this Apache Wave Wikipedia page : It was, up until a > couple > >> >>> of > >> >>> >>> >> > months, > >> >>> >>> >> > the Google Wave page and it has simply been renamed Apache > Wave. I > >> >>> >>> think > >> >>> >>> >> it > >> >>> >>> >> > was a bad move, this page should have stayed the Google > Wave page > >> >>> >>> since > >> >>> >>> >> > Google Wave is still an existing service, and a new Apache > Wave > >> >>> page > >> >>> >>> >> should > >> >>> >>> >> > have been created from scratch since it's a fresh start for > the > >> >>> >>> product. > >> >>> >>> >> I > >> >>> >>> >> > think the renaming edit of the page should simply be > undone, but I > >> >>> >>> guess > >> >>> >>> >> > this will trigger a debate among the contributors. > >> >>> >>> >> > > >> >>> >>> >> > - Jeremy > >> >>> >>> >> > > >> >>> >>> >> > > >> >>> >>> >> > On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Dan Peterson < > >> >>> [email protected] > >> >>> >>> > > >> >>> >>> >> > wrote: > >> >>> >>> >> > > >> >>> >>> >> > > Agreed -- go for it! > >> >>> >>> >> > > > >> >>> >>> >> > > > >> >>> >>> >> > > ----- Original Message ----- > >> >>> >>> >> > > From: Upayavira [mailto:[email protected]] > >> >>> >>> >> > > Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 04:33 AM > >> >>> >>> >> > > To: [email protected] < > >> >>> [email protected]> > >> >>> >>> >> > > Subject: Re: Update Wiki for Apache Wave > >> >>> >>> >> > > > >> >>> >>> >> > > I'd say just do it. If anyone wants to help, they will > have an > >> >>> >>> 'edit' > >> >>> >>> >> > > button too. > >> >>> >>> >> > > > >> >>> >>> >> > > Upayavira > >> >>> >>> >> > > > >> >>> >>> >> > > On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 22:25 +0300, "Yuri Z" < > [email protected]> > >> >>> >>> wrote: > >> >>> >>> >> > > > I stumbled upon the Wiki page for Apache > >> >>> >>> >> > > > Wave<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apache_Wave>- and my > >> >>> >>> impression > >> >>> >>> >> was > >> >>> >>> >> > > > that it's of very low quality and conveys very > >> >>> >>> >> > > > little information about Apache Wave and Wave in a Box > >> >>> project. > >> >>> >>> Most > >> >>> >>> >> of > >> >>> >>> >> > > > the > >> >>> >>> >> > > > information is related to Google Wave. I thought that > it > >> >>> could > >> >>> >>> be > >> >>> >>> >> nice > >> >>> >>> >> > > > to > >> >>> >>> >> > > > discuss how we can improve /restructure the Wiki entry > for > >> >>> Apache > >> >>> >>> >> Wave. > >> >>> >>> >> > > > > >> >>> >>> >> > > > >> >>> >>> >> > > >> >>> >>> >> > >> >>> >>> > > >> >>> >>> > > >> >>> >>> > >> >>> >> > >> >>> > > >> >>> > >> >> > >> > > >> > >> > > > > >
