You mean at; http://waveinabox.net/ I thought of that , but I cant seem to load it.
"A turbulence detected! Please save your last changes to somewhere and reload the wave." (starts as soon as a load - Chrome 14.0.835.109 beta-m. Doesn't work on the Beta of chrome?) On 29 August 2011 19:42, Yuri Z <[email protected]> wrote: > Great work Thomas, thanks! > Just one suggestion - can we move the discussion to Google Wave? > > On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 8:35 PM, Thomas Wrobel <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I wrote a early draft here; >> >> https://docs.google.com/document/pub?id=14AbilsPE6NRTwBildiTtSQ4I5T3Is7lbmgHnUt95lMc >> >> Let me know if I am going along the right lines, and I'll correct/add >> to based on feedback. >> >> -Thomas >> >> ~~~~~~ >> Reviews of anything, by anyone; >> www.rateoholic.co.uk >> Please try out my new site and give feedback :) >> >> >> >> On 29 August 2011 17:16, Michael MacFadden <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > done. >> > >> > >> > On Aug 29, 2011, at 7:16 AM, Yuri Z wrote: >> > >> >> @Michael, Can you please add Thomas to contributors so he would be able >> to assign the JIRA task to himself? >> >> >> >> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 5:14 PM, Yuri Z <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Yeah :) Thanks >> >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Thomas Wrobel <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> Would this do as the task; >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WAVE-290 >> >> >> >> >> >> On 29 August 2011 15:50, Paul Thomas <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > Epic? WAIB goes under there. >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > ________________________________ >> >> > From: Thomas Wrobel <[email protected]> >> >> > To: [email protected] >> >> > Sent: Mon, 29 August, 2011 14:30:16 >> >> > Subject: Re: Update Wiki for Apache Wave >> >> > >> >> > Sure...should I categorise this as just a "TASK" or maybe a >> >> > "STORY".....kinda new to all this so not sure what category this issue >> >> > would fall under. (I dread to think what gets put under "EPIC" !) >> >> > >> >> > -Thomas >> >> > >> >> > ~~~~~~ >> >> > Reviews of anything, by anyone; >> >> > www.rateoholic.co.uk >> >> > Please try out my new site and give feedback :) >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > On 29 August 2011 14:44, Yuri Z <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> Thanks for picking this up Thomas. You can open an issue in the Wave >> JIRA >> >> >> for this and assign it to yourself. >> >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Thomas Wrobel <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >>> Seeing as I didn't have much luck picking apart the code, I could >> have >> >> >>> a go at this. At least to put more details in then there is now. >> >> >>> >> >> >>> Probably need checking over after I'm done for accuracy/missing >> >> >>> information. (and spelling...) >> >> >>> >> >> >>> Shall I sign up for the task? >> >> >>> >> >> >>> -Thomas Wrobel >> >> >>> >> >> >>> ~~~~~~ >> >> >>> Reviews of anything, by anyone; >> >> >>> www.rateoholic.co.uk >> >> >>> Please try out my new site and give feedback :) >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> On 27 August 2011 14:09, Yuri Z <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >>> > I think a good first step for creation Apache Wave Wiki page would >> be >> >> >>> fill >> >> >>> > in the "History" part of the "About Apache Wave" page at >> >> >>> > http://incubator.apache.org/wave/about.html. >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> > Currently the "History" contains the following TODO: "Lets >> summarize >> >> >>> Google >> >> >>> > Wave, Fed One, Wave in a Box, Apache Wave, the protocol, etc. It >> will be >> >> >>> > interesting to keep this information for people to understand how >> the >> >> >>> > project has evolved." >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> > Would be great of someone would take on the task to address this >> TODO. >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> > On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 8:41 AM, Yuri Z <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> >> Great! Thanks for taking on this! >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> 2011/8/10 Jérémy Naegel <[email protected]> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >>> Suggestion made here : >> >> >>> >>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Apache_Wave#Apache_Wave >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> - Jeremy >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 6:24 PM, Jérémy Naegel < >> [email protected]> >> >> >>> >>> wrote: >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> > What I'm not familiar with is the Wikipedia revision / >> revocation of >> >> >>> >>> > changes policy... >> >> >>> >>> > >> >> >>> >>> > I'll try to suggest that change inside the discussion page and >> see if >> >> >>> it >> >> >>> >>> > triggers any reaction. >> >> >>> >>> > After a few days without reactions or with positive reactions, >> I >> >> >>> guess >> >> >>> >>> it >> >> >>> >>> > would be OK to change back the title. >> >> >>> >>> > >> >> >>> >>> > Then it will be possible to create a new "Apache Wave" entry >> (as it >> >> >>> >>> won't >> >> >>> >>> > be a duplicate). >> >> >>> >>> > I could start it, with the Apache Wave website definition and >> some >> >> >>> >>> general >> >> >>> >>> > infos, but I won't be able to add technical details. >> >> >>> >>> > >> >> >>> >>> > Btw, If someone whose mother tongue is English wants to help, >> that >> >> >>> would >> >> >>> >>> be >> >> >>> >>> > much appreciated! >> >> >>> >>> > >> >> >>> >>> > - Jeremy >> >> >>> >>> > >> >> >>> >>> > >> >> >>> >>> > >> >> >>> >>> > On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 1:11 PM, Yuri Z <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> >>> >>> > >> >> >>> >>> >> I see. So I guess that's what should be done. The entry >> should be >> >> >>> >>> renamed >> >> >>> >>> >> back to Google Wave and a new entry for Apache Wave (and Wave >> in a >> >> >>> Box) >> >> >>> >>> >> should be created. >> >> >>> >>> >> I am not that familiar with the standards for creating Wiki >> entries, >> >> >>> >>> also, >> >> >>> >>> >> I personally would prefer to spend my spare time on actually >> >> >>> creating >> >> >>> >>> >> patches for WIAB. So I thought that maybe some non technical >> >> >>> community >> >> >>> >>> >> member would like to take on this (actually very important) >> task. >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >> >>> >>> >> 2011/8/10 Jérémy Naegel <[email protected]> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >> >>> >>> >> > About this Apache Wave Wikipedia page : It was, up until a >> couple >> >> >>> of >> >> >>> >>> >> > months, >> >> >>> >>> >> > the Google Wave page and it has simply been renamed Apache >> Wave. I >> >> >>> >>> think >> >> >>> >>> >> it >> >> >>> >>> >> > was a bad move, this page should have stayed the Google >> Wave page >> >> >>> >>> since >> >> >>> >>> >> > Google Wave is still an existing service, and a new Apache >> Wave >> >> >>> page >> >> >>> >>> >> should >> >> >>> >>> >> > have been created from scratch since it's a fresh start for >> the >> >> >>> >>> product. >> >> >>> >>> >> I >> >> >>> >>> >> > think the renaming edit of the page should simply be >> undone, but I >> >> >>> >>> guess >> >> >>> >>> >> > this will trigger a debate among the contributors. >> >> >>> >>> >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > - Jeremy >> >> >>> >>> >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Dan Peterson < >> >> >>> [email protected] >> >> >>> >>> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > wrote: >> >> >>> >>> >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> > > Agreed -- go for it! >> >> >>> >>> >> > > >> >> >>> >>> >> > > >> >> >>> >>> >> > > ----- Original Message ----- >> >> >>> >>> >> > > From: Upayavira [mailto:[email protected]] >> >> >>> >>> >> > > Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 04:33 AM >> >> >>> >>> >> > > To: [email protected] < >> >> >>> [email protected]> >> >> >>> >>> >> > > Subject: Re: Update Wiki for Apache Wave >> >> >>> >>> >> > > >> >> >>> >>> >> > > I'd say just do it. If anyone wants to help, they will >> have an >> >> >>> >>> 'edit' >> >> >>> >>> >> > > button too. >> >> >>> >>> >> > > >> >> >>> >>> >> > > Upayavira >> >> >>> >>> >> > > >> >> >>> >>> >> > > On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 22:25 +0300, "Yuri Z" < >> [email protected]> >> >> >>> >>> wrote: >> >> >>> >>> >> > > > I stumbled upon the Wiki page for Apache >> >> >>> >>> >> > > > Wave<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apache_Wave>- and my >> >> >>> >>> impression >> >> >>> >>> >> was >> >> >>> >>> >> > > > that it's of very low quality and conveys very >> >> >>> >>> >> > > > little information about Apache Wave and Wave in a Box >> >> >>> project. >> >> >>> >>> Most >> >> >>> >>> >> of >> >> >>> >>> >> > > > the >> >> >>> >>> >> > > > information is related to Google Wave. I thought that >> it >> >> >>> could >> >> >>> >>> be >> >> >>> >>> >> nice >> >> >>> >>> >> > > > to >> >> >>> >>> >> > > > discuss how we can improve /restructure the Wiki entry >> for >> >> >>> Apache >> >> >>> >>> >> Wave. >> >> >>> >>> >> > > > >> >> >>> >>> >> > > >> >> >>> >>> >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >> >>> >>> > >> >> >>> >>> > >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> > >> > >> >
