@Michael, Can you please add Thomas to contributors so he would be able to assign the JIRA task to himself?
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 5:14 PM, Yuri Z <[email protected]> wrote: > Yeah :) Thanks > > > On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Thomas Wrobel <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Would this do as the task; >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WAVE-290 >> >> >> On 29 August 2011 15:50, Paul Thomas <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Epic? WAIB goes under there. >> > >> > >> > >> > ________________________________ >> > From: Thomas Wrobel <[email protected]> >> > To: [email protected] >> > Sent: Mon, 29 August, 2011 14:30:16 >> > Subject: Re: Update Wiki for Apache Wave >> > >> > Sure...should I categorise this as just a "TASK" or maybe a >> > "STORY".....kinda new to all this so not sure what category this issue >> > would fall under. (I dread to think what gets put under "EPIC" !) >> > >> > -Thomas >> > >> > ~~~~~~ >> > Reviews of anything, by anyone; >> > www.rateoholic.co.uk >> > Please try out my new site and give feedback :) >> > >> > >> > >> > On 29 August 2011 14:44, Yuri Z <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Thanks for picking this up Thomas. You can open an issue in the Wave >> JIRA >> >> for this and assign it to yourself. >> >> >> >> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Thomas Wrobel <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> >> >>> Seeing as I didn't have much luck picking apart the code, I could have >> >>> a go at this. At least to put more details in then there is now. >> >>> >> >>> Probably need checking over after I'm done for accuracy/missing >> >>> information. (and spelling...) >> >>> >> >>> Shall I sign up for the task? >> >>> >> >>> -Thomas Wrobel >> >>> >> >>> ~~~~~~ >> >>> Reviews of anything, by anyone; >> >>> www.rateoholic.co.uk >> >>> Please try out my new site and give feedback :) >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> On 27 August 2011 14:09, Yuri Z <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> > I think a good first step for creation Apache Wave Wiki page would >> be >> >>> fill >> >>> > in the "History" part of the "About Apache Wave" page at >> >>> > http://incubator.apache.org/wave/about.html. >> >>> > >> >>> > Currently the "History" contains the following TODO: "Lets summarize >> >>> Google >> >>> > Wave, Fed One, Wave in a Box, Apache Wave, the protocol, etc. It >> will be >> >>> > interesting to keep this information for people to understand how >> the >> >>> > project has evolved." >> >>> > >> >>> > Would be great of someone would take on the task to address this >> TODO. >> >>> > >> >>> > On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 8:41 AM, Yuri Z <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> > >> >>> >> Great! Thanks for taking on this! >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> 2011/8/10 Jérémy Naegel <[email protected]> >> >>> >> >> >>> >>> Suggestion made here : >> >>> >>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Apache_Wave#Apache_Wave >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> - Jeremy >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 6:24 PM, Jérémy Naegel < >> [email protected]> >> >>> >>> wrote: >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> > What I'm not familiar with is the Wikipedia revision / >> revocation of >> >>> >>> > changes policy... >> >>> >>> > >> >>> >>> > I'll try to suggest that change inside the discussion page and >> see if >> >>> it >> >>> >>> > triggers any reaction. >> >>> >>> > After a few days without reactions or with positive reactions, I >> >>> guess >> >>> >>> it >> >>> >>> > would be OK to change back the title. >> >>> >>> > >> >>> >>> > Then it will be possible to create a new "Apache Wave" entry (as >> it >> >>> >>> won't >> >>> >>> > be a duplicate). >> >>> >>> > I could start it, with the Apache Wave website definition and >> some >> >>> >>> general >> >>> >>> > infos, but I won't be able to add technical details. >> >>> >>> > >> >>> >>> > Btw, If someone whose mother tongue is English wants to help, >> that >> >>> would >> >>> >>> be >> >>> >>> > much appreciated! >> >>> >>> > >> >>> >>> > - Jeremy >> >>> >>> > >> >>> >>> > >> >>> >>> > >> >>> >>> > On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 1:11 PM, Yuri Z <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> > >> >>> >>> >> I see. So I guess that's what should be done. The entry should >> be >> >>> >>> renamed >> >>> >>> >> back to Google Wave and a new entry for Apache Wave (and Wave >> in a >> >>> Box) >> >>> >>> >> should be created. >> >>> >>> >> I am not that familiar with the standards for creating Wiki >> entries, >> >>> >>> also, >> >>> >>> >> I personally would prefer to spend my spare time on actually >> >>> creating >> >>> >>> >> patches for WIAB. So I thought that maybe some non technical >> >>> community >> >>> >>> >> member would like to take on this (actually very important) >> task. >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> 2011/8/10 Jérémy Naegel <[email protected]> >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> > About this Apache Wave Wikipedia page : It was, up until a >> couple >> >>> of >> >>> >>> >> > months, >> >>> >>> >> > the Google Wave page and it has simply been renamed Apache >> Wave. I >> >>> >>> think >> >>> >>> >> it >> >>> >>> >> > was a bad move, this page should have stayed the Google Wave >> page >> >>> >>> since >> >>> >>> >> > Google Wave is still an existing service, and a new Apache >> Wave >> >>> page >> >>> >>> >> should >> >>> >>> >> > have been created from scratch since it's a fresh start for >> the >> >>> >>> product. >> >>> >>> >> I >> >>> >>> >> > think the renaming edit of the page should simply be undone, >> but I >> >>> >>> guess >> >>> >>> >> > this will trigger a debate among the contributors. >> >>> >>> >> > >> >>> >>> >> > - Jeremy >> >>> >>> >> > >> >>> >>> >> > >> >>> >>> >> > On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Dan Peterson < >> >>> [email protected] >> >>> >>> > >> >>> >>> >> > wrote: >> >>> >>> >> > >> >>> >>> >> > > Agreed -- go for it! >> >>> >>> >> > > >> >>> >>> >> > > >> >>> >>> >> > > ----- Original Message ----- >> >>> >>> >> > > From: Upayavira [mailto:[email protected]] >> >>> >>> >> > > Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 04:33 AM >> >>> >>> >> > > To: [email protected] < >> >>> [email protected]> >> >>> >>> >> > > Subject: Re: Update Wiki for Apache Wave >> >>> >>> >> > > >> >>> >>> >> > > I'd say just do it. If anyone wants to help, they will have >> an >> >>> >>> 'edit' >> >>> >>> >> > > button too. >> >>> >>> >> > > >> >>> >>> >> > > Upayavira >> >>> >>> >> > > >> >>> >>> >> > > On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 22:25 +0300, "Yuri Z" < >> [email protected]> >> >>> >>> wrote: >> >>> >>> >> > > > I stumbled upon the Wiki page for Apache >> >>> >>> >> > > > Wave<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apache_Wave>- and my >> >>> >>> impression >> >>> >>> >> was >> >>> >>> >> > > > that it's of very low quality and conveys very >> >>> >>> >> > > > little information about Apache Wave and Wave in a Box >> >>> project. >> >>> >>> Most >> >>> >>> >> of >> >>> >>> >> > > > the >> >>> >>> >> > > > information is related to Google Wave. I thought that it >> >>> could >> >>> >>> be >> >>> >>> >> nice >> >>> >>> >> > > > to >> >>> >>> >> > > > discuss how we can improve /restructure the Wiki entry >> for >> >>> Apache >> >>> >>> >> Wave. >> >>> >>> >> > > > >> >>> >>> >> > > >> >>> >>> >> > >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> > >> >>> >>> > >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> >> >>> > >> >>> >> >> >> > >> > >
