KAthy Gill wrote:
> >Matthew Soffen wrote:
> >> At 12:01 AM 7/31/98 -0700, Jack Killpatrick wrote:
> >> [snip]
> >> >
> >> >I'm milling over the choice of
> >> >
> >> >a) NT/Perl/ColdFusion/SQL Server or
> >> >b) Unix/Perl/Modules/mySQL
> >> >
> >> >for a large project now. I am leaning toward solution "a"
> because of the
> >> >development interface for SQL Server, which in my case will be Access.
>
>
> Hi gang -- just finished a three day CF class -- and am even more
> impressed
> with its performance and its "rapid development" characteristics.
Congrat's on the 3-day class. I'm leaning toward the solution that uses CF
for many reasons, most related to CF and it's ability to simplify the
process of processing data and it's ability to cache data well. They've got
some very cool tags going for them and a lot of good ideas on the horizon
(went to a Jeremy Allaire presentation at Seybold last month). If I go the
"a" route I can also use Perl to do some heavy
text-file-to-database-importing, which will be needed by the project ahead
of me. CF is somewhat lacking in that dept.
Jack
____________________________________________________________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Join The Web Consultants Association : Register on our web site Now
Web Consultants Web Site : http://just4u.com/webconsultants
If you lose the instructions All subscription/unsubscribing can be done
directly from our website for all our lists.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
