[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > > I may be wrong, but I think, she saw obstruction of justice and
> > > decided it was her Duty as a citizen of the United States to do something
> > > about it. If so, she should not be charged, but thanked.
> >
> > Have to disagree with that. If she wanted to "do something", she could
> > have simply reported it and gone away. Going ahead to illegally tape
> > and entrap someone, and further try to get a book deal out of it, is
> > illegal no matter the justification . . . and only goes to muck up a
> > proper investigation to boot.
>
> It is not clear whether there was some encouragement before or after
> the fact. But I do believe she acted properly in exposing a huge national
> security problem!
>
> > Again, I'm not sure the lines are that clear. He lied in a political
> > front, not an official one. While it in no way changes the fact that he
>
> There are three points.
>
> One, he lied to the public, and apparently in the legal sense of
> perjury. (Either that, or he makes Ronald Reagan look like a Master of
> Memory!)
>
> > And not one iota of it has anything to do with the job itself.
>
<<SNIP>>
I have to side with javilk on this issue. IMHO, anyone with their
finger that close to the panic button that can lead to a nuclear
Armagedon MUST by above character reproach! The intangibles of
character, honesty, and integrity are very important to the PERSONAL and
PUBLIC side. There is no separating them; they are mutually dependent.
--
John Stewart
SUPSHIP San Diego
Information Systems Security Mgr
--------------------------------
____________________________________________________________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Join The Web Consultants Association : Register on our web site Now
Web Consultants Web Site : http://just4u.com/webconsultants
If you lose the instructions All subscription/unsubscribing can be done
directly from our website for all our lists.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
