At 09:27 AM 6/5/98 -0700, Kathy wrote:
>(2) more important .. intel has engaged in anti-competitive practices --
>which is what is "illegal" ... not the having of a monopoly per recent case
>in either NC or SC was won by the plaintiff.
>===============================
>Kathy
While it might be true today that the behavior is the determining factor in
determining whether a firm is a "monopoly", the justice department has been
inconsistent in how it interprets the anti-trust laws; at some times they
have prosecuted form (usually based on market share or some slightly more
complex test), and at other times they have prosecuted behavior (ATT was
for years OK because they didn't 'act' like a monopoly.)
And George M. wrote:
>There are products available (no personal experience) such as Net
>nanny and Cyber Patrol that allows parents to control what their
>kids watch. As far as adults are concerned, well... they're adults.
>
>George
Exactly. And as far as children are concerned, supervision is always a
possibility...
Doug
____________________________________________________________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Join The Web Consultants Association : Register on our web site Now
Web Consultants Web Site : http://just4u.com/webconsultants
If you lose the instructions All subscription/unsubscribing can be done
directly from our website for all our lists.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
