On 2011-09-26, at 1:05 PM, Ramsey Gurley wrote: > > On Sep 26, 2011, at 3:57 AM, Jim Kinsey wrote: > >> The last time I did any interviewing for developers, we ended up with some >> devs who really did not want to engage with WO on any level, no matter how >> they came across in the interview. Years of complaining about WO, misusing >> it in ways which hurt the performance of the system (as the last remaining >> experienced WO developer I often ended up wading in to sort it out) and then >> blaming it on WO without having made the least attempt to learn it >> properly... > > Unfortunately, using WO doesn't make one a great programmer (^_^) Misused, > WO is just as awful as any other solution. If anything, WO provides ample > opportunity for misuse because there is so much of WO/Wonder to learn. > > Some devs just don't want to learn. They prefer to reinvent, poorly.
Agreed. I don't know how many times I've heard the "this is stupid, just tell me how to get a jdbc connection" comment. -- David LeBer Codeferous Software 'co-def-er-ous' adj. Literally 'code-bearing' site: http://codeferous.com blog: http://davidleber.net profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidleber twitter: http://twitter.com/rebeld -- Toronto Area Cocoa / WebObjects developers group: http://tacow.org _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [email protected]
