"Shawn Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 4:34 PM, Richard Lowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> John Plocher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>  > [dropped advocacy-discuss]
>>  >
>>  > Eric Boutilier wrote:
>>  >> On Tue, 18 Mar 2008, John Plocher wrote:
>>  >>> Rather than inventing a solution and then trying to fit
>>  >>> everything into it,
>>  >>
>>  >> Not sure I follow.
>>  >
>>  > I get the impression that the solution is "let's have an
>>  > OS.com *and* an OS.org", but we still don't have a common
>>  > understanding of what the problem is.
>>  >
>>  > I'd rather start with a problem statement that we all
>>  > understand, come up with a common vision of what the
>>  > world would look like if the problems were all fixed,
>>  > and then work on figuring out what needs to be done
>>  > to get there.
>>  >
>>  >> Fair enough. As for me, I still believe that a plan that aims to
>>  >> gradually (over a year or two?) phase things so that eventually
>>  >> everything falls under one or the other
>>  >
>>  > Why would this be any better than simply redoing OS.org?
>>  > (or am I being dense and you are simply alluding to a shift
>>  > in charter from one style of community governance to another?)
>>
>>  I'd assumed the aim was to avoid that.  Such that opensolaris.com
>>  aimed squarely at users and all that stuff, but opensolaris.org (and
>>  thus us) get left alone.
>
> I don't understand why this switch wouldn't be the opposite direction.
>
> As someone else mentioned earlier .org implies a non-commercial website.
>
> I would expect user groups, etc. to be there.
>
> I would expect opensolaris.com to be Sun's commercial portal to opensolaris.
>
> Maybe I'm just missing something...
>

Yeah, I'm not sure how the commercial bits and the other bits entirely
fit either.  I certainly think Sun's commercial interest needs to be
largely separate from opensolaris.org, perhaps the user-ish bits in
the opensolaris.com text are users of the *Sun commercial stuff*, and
not users in general?

Either way, I still read it to suggest the separation is in part to
leave opensolaris.org alone, or, perhaps more accurately?, to not have
to wedge their grand marketing plan (or whatever) into the
opensolaris.org world.

-- Rich
_______________________________________________
website-discuss mailing list
[email protected]

Reply via email to