Richard Lowe wrote: > Yeah, I'm not sure how the commercial bits and the other bits entirely > fit either. I certainly think Sun's commercial interest needs to be > largely separate from opensolaris.org, perhaps the user-ish bits in > the opensolaris.com text are users of the *Sun commercial stuff*, and > not users in general? > > Either way, I still read it to suggest the separation is in part to > leave opensolaris.org alone, or, perhaps more accurately?, to not have > to wedge their grand marketing plan (or whatever) into the > opensolaris.org world.
And that's true to some extent. Engineering does a great job at writing code, but a poor job at describing the features they're writing to the end user. I think that's the sole reason why .org falls down from a marketing perspective. Look at the home page - it's stale, and doesn't encourage me as a user to even want to download and run it. I don't have a strong opinion about the need for multi-domain, though I do think it's a better phased approach than causing a lot of refactoring on .org. What do you want .org to be? If you changed things now, what would you do? Glynn _______________________________________________ website-discuss mailing list [email protected]
