[dropped advocacy-discuss]
Eric Boutilier wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Mar 2008, John Plocher wrote:
>> Rather than inventing a solution and then trying to fit
>> everything into it,
>
> Not sure I follow.
I get the impression that the solution is "let's have an
OS.com *and* an OS.org", but we still don't have a common
understanding of what the problem is.
I'd rather start with a problem statement that we all
understand, come up with a common vision of what the
world would look like if the problems were all fixed,
and then work on figuring out what needs to be done
to get there.
> Fair enough. As for me, I still believe that a plan that aims to
> gradually (over a year or two?) phase things so that eventually
> everything falls under one or the other
Why would this be any better than simply redoing OS.org?
(or am I being dense and you are simply alluding to a shift
in charter from one style of community governance to another?)
-John
_______________________________________________
website-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
