John Plocher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [dropped advocacy-discuss] > > Eric Boutilier wrote: >> On Tue, 18 Mar 2008, John Plocher wrote: >>> Rather than inventing a solution and then trying to fit >>> everything into it, >> >> Not sure I follow. > > I get the impression that the solution is "let's have an > OS.com *and* an OS.org", but we still don't have a common > understanding of what the problem is. > > I'd rather start with a problem statement that we all > understand, come up with a common vision of what the > world would look like if the problems were all fixed, > and then work on figuring out what needs to be done > to get there. > >> Fair enough. As for me, I still believe that a plan that aims to >> gradually (over a year or two?) phase things so that eventually >> everything falls under one or the other > > Why would this be any better than simply redoing OS.org? > (or am I being dense and you are simply alluding to a shift > in charter from one style of community governance to another?)
I'd assumed the aim was to avoid that. Such that opensolaris.com aimed squarely at users and all that stuff, but opensolaris.org (and thus us) get left alone. -- Rich _______________________________________________ website-discuss mailing list [email protected]
