I know how to read lips, but I really don't find it all that 
practical.  Everyone just seems to ask where the fuck did I learn 
how to drive.  It's nice though, that they are interested.

--- In [email protected], "Ellen" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> You are completely missing my point, but that's OK.  You are
> reinforcing my perhaps implied point that deaf people communicate
> fantasically with other deaf people, but they don't communicate so
> well with hearing people.  Is that really up for debate?  You can
> argue all day long that they don't feel that they should have to
> communicate with hearing people, but if that is the case they are
> cutting themselves off from the majority of the population.  You
> haven't said anything that contradicts anything I said. However, I
> will say that saying things like "your disabled imagination and 
clear
> lack of class" is unnecessarily cruel and mean spirited and 
insulting.
>  I am not insulting deaf people.  I guess it is similar to moving 
to
> America from another country and not learning English.  Sure you 
don't
> have to learn English, but your opportunities will be limited.  You
> can hang out with other non English speaking people and just talk 
to
> them and only get jobs with other people who speak your language, 
but
> you aren't going to convince me that this isn't limiting.  I am 
fully
> aware that deaf people have their own culture, communication,
> organizations, etc.  I never said they didn't.  But they are 
exclusive
> to deaf people presumably, unless hearing people want to be with a
> group of people who only communicate in sign language, which they 
are
> more than welcome to do.  Deaf people may not fell disabled any 
more
> than non English speaking people do, but I find it hard to believe
> they don't feel excluded to some extent.  People may not 
intentionally
> exclude them, but if 2 people are talking and not facing the deaf
> person so she can read their lips or they aren't using sign 
language
> she will feel excluded.  I don't have a narrow-minded view of what 
it
> takes to live a full and rich life.  Their lives may be as full and
> rich as they could imagine.  But don't you think some of them might
> want to know what they're missing? Or at least be able to 
understand
> what people are saying? Again, why is this different from wanting 
to
> be able see if you are blind?  Anyway, I think most deaf people 
learn
> to lip read in any case, so I kind of think they are overreacting 
if
> this is really an issue.
> 
> Am I truly alone in my opinion?  I have no idea if these protests 
are
> justifiable or not, that's probably subjective.  This whole 
lipreading
> thing may be the least of it.  For all I know she could be a 
terrible
> president, I have no idea.  But to say that learning to lipread or
> whatever is trying to "pass for hearing" seems a bit extreme.
> 
> 
> --- In [email protected], Eleanor Keyser
> <eleanorkeyser@> wrote:
> >
> > Ellen are you serious?  No, really?
> > 
> > The Deaf community is more than just a group of people who have
> trouble in the hearing world.  It's an entire culture, with its own
> language, arts, sports leagues, churches, and schools.  Sign 
languages
> are fully formed natural languages that have evolved wherever 
groups
> of Deaf people have lived together.  There are many sign languages,
> and many dialects within sign languages.  Many members of the Deaf
> community (especially those who are congenitally deaf and learned a
> signed language as their first language) don't feel disabled AT 
ALL. 
> They feel like they are constantly knocking heads with 
the "disabled"
> label.  Deaf people participate in a fully formed, beautiful 
culture
> based on a common language.  Gallaudet is one of the most important
> institutions in the American Deaf community.  Deaf people have a
> tremendous amount of pride in Gallaudet, and to imagine it being
> headed by a woman perceived as less than a full-fledged member of 
the
> community is appalling.  As I
> >  understand it, there are myriad other issues at stake for the
> protesters, but their main fear is people like you.  If you 
actually
> can't see past your own narrow-minded view of what is necessary to
> live a full and rich life, and what cultural experiences constitute
> the best possible life, I suggest you refrain from letting other
> people hear your nonsense, lest we pity you for your disabled
> imagination and clear lack of class.
> > 
> > And for the record, Signed Exact English is exactly that, a 
visual
> version of English using English syntax, a syntax which is nothing 
at
> all like the syntax of signed languages.  Finger spelling is also
> exactly what it sounds like--just English words spelled out with
> fingers.  In ASL finger spelling is used only for proper nouns, 
though
> many proper nouns have signs as well.  Being given a name sign is 
an
> honor.  ASL and other signed languages are just as complex and 
unique
> as any language--they are not some lower class of English.
> > 
> > Ellen <ellengoodman6@> wrote: That was a total non sequiteur.  Do
> you honestly believe that deaf 
> > people wouldn't rather be able to hear?  And understand what 
people 
> > are saying if they aren't using sign language?  This has NOTHING 
to 
> > do with how other people feel about them.  This is just about 
> > ability.  Lightening your skin to have better opportunities 
would 
> > just be about acceptance and changing how people feel about you 
> > (maybe, unfortunately).  It wouldn't change your inherent 
abilities 
> > or strengths or skills.  You still haven't answered my basic 
> > question.  Regardless of what deaf people say to the media or in 
> > public, do you truly think that at least a good number wouldn't 
> > rather be able to hear what is going on around them, given the 
> > choice?  Why is it any different than blind people wanting to be 
able 
> > to see?  Again, should I have been content to just go along with 
what 
> > nature gave me and not be able to to fully function in society 
> > because I refused to correct my vision?  There is something 
wrong 
> > with these people's hearing mechanism!  They have to compensate 
or 
> > correct it, or they won't be able to fully participate in their 
> > society.  Do I really sound prejudiced?  You're certainly 
entitled to 
> > your opinion, but I think deaf people should be able to do 
everything 
> > they are capable of.  I just think that if they want to take 
> > advantage of technology to improve their hearing or comprehend 
speech 
> > without sign language, they should be able to.  Is that really a 
> > problem?  Black people don't have something wrong with their 
skin or 
> > pigment, it's just different.  I don't really think it is a 
> > complicated philosophical question, and you can argue just for 
the 
> > sake of arguing, but it is totally different than black people 
> > wanting to be white just to be accepted.  At least that is my 
> > perspective, obviously.
> > 
> > --- In [email protected], "dvm8375" 
> >  wrote:
> > >
> > > By your logic, should black people lighten their skin to have 
> > better 
> > > social/professional/etc. opportunities too?
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > --- In [email protected], "Ellen" 
> > >  wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I guess my issue is that deaf people who don't lip-read can 
only 
> > > > communicate with each other or people who happened to learn 
sign 
> > > > language out of interest or in order to communicate with 
deaf 
> > > people 
> > > > in their lives.  Do deaf people really think lipreading is 
such a 
> > > bad 
> > > > thing?  I wonder if most deaf people don't honestly wish 
they 
> > > could 
> > > > hear.  I don't think any blind people don't wish they could 
see.  
> > > Yes 
> > > > of course in a concert you can hear the vibrations, etc., 
you can 
> > > see 
> > > > people clapping, you learn ways around it.  But don't you 
think 
> > > you 
> > > > have more professional, social, etc. opportunities if you 
can 
> > hear 
> > > > what is going on around you?  I realize there are two 
different 
> > > but 
> > > > related issues, lipreading and cochlear implants or other 
devices 
> > > > to "cure" deafness.  I don't think I'm being harsh, just 
> > > realistic. 
> > > > You are welcome to disagree, but that is how I feel.
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > --- In [email protected], "Daria Akers" 
> > > > >  wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Fully enjoy? Humm.... they don't enjoy them like you do 
but 
> > > that 
> > > > > doesn't
> > > > > > mean that they enjoy them less. I would insert the 
article 
> > > from 
> > > > the 
> > > > > Post a
> > > > > > few months ago about the deaf interpreters at the Billy 
Joel 
> > > > > concert. Great
> > > > > > article.
> > > > > > Besides people who are differently-abled sometimes do 
things 
> > > that 
> > > > > we never
> > > > > > even thought about..... This video is a perfect example:
> > > > > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YBv79LKfMt4
> > > > > > I've personally never thought about trying to learn to 
echo 
> > > > locate 
> > > > > because I
> > > > > > don't have to but sure would be cool.
> > > > > > Ok that had nothing to do with what we were talking 
about but 
> > > > it's 
> > > > > soooo
> > > > > > COOL.
> > > > > > Daria
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > On 10/12/06, Ellen  wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > gay vs. deaf is apples and oranges--I'm not talking 
about 
> > > > > acceptance
> > > > > > > vs. discrimination like is the issue with the gay 
> > community, 
> > > I'm
> > > > > > > talking about being able to to fully participate in 
> > > society.  
> > > > Gay
> > > > > > > people can fully participate in society, except for 
getting 
> > > > > married.
> > > > > > > They can fully enjoy concerts, movies, plays, waves 
> > > crashing, 
> > > > rain
> > > > > > > against the window, etc.  It's not an issue 
of "getting 
> > away 
> > > > with"
> > > > > > > being a hearing person, it's an issue of being able to 
fully
> > > > > > > participate in/enjoy all life has to offer.  IMO.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >  
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
>





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/weingartenchatters/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/weingartenchatters/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to