I'm looking bit deeper and it seems that the semantics of IWrapModel is slightly different than I though, so just silently ignore the question :)
Matej Knopp wrote: > Sorry, I meant getNestedModel of course (as there's no such thing as > getWrappedModel). > > Matej Knopp wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm going through the big model change in 2.0 and I noticed that now we >> have IWrapModel, but IModel still contains getWrappedModel(). >> >> Wouldn't it be cleaner if the getWrappedModel was a member of IWrapModel? >> >> -Matej >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wicket-develop mailing list >> Wicket-develop@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > Wicket-develop mailing list > Wicket-develop@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop > _______________________________________________ Wicket-develop mailing list Wicket-develop@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
