Re: [Wicket-develop] Model change in 2.0

[Igor Vaynberg]

i am also thinking of moving getNestedModel into a separate interface because not all models have nested models, and im not even sure we need it period so removing it completely is also an option imho

thoughts?

-igor

On 6/21/06, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

I'm looking bit deeper and it seems that the semantics of IWrapModel is
slightly different than I though, so just silently ignore the question :)

Matej Knopp wrote:
> Sorry, I meant getNestedModel of course (as there's no such thing as
> getWrappedModel).
>
> Matej Knopp wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm going through the big model change in 2.0 and I noticed that now we
>> have IWrapModel, but IModel still contains getWrappedModel().
>>
>> Wouldn't it be cleaner if the getWrappedModel was a member of IWrapModel?
>>
>> -Matej
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wicket-develop mailing list
>> Wicket-develop@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wicket-develop mailing list
> Wicket-develop@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
>



_______________________________________________
Wicket-develop mailing list
Wicket-develop@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop

_______________________________________________
Wicket-develop mailing list
Wicket-develop@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop