+1 for 2.0

less is more.

Martijn

On 6/21/06, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If we can can rid of it, all the better. I don't think the semantics
> are great, and they are covered through other means now. If we remove
> getNestedModel, we should also remove
> wicket.Component#sameRootModel(wicket.Component) and
> wicket.Component#sameRootModel(IModel) and update the documentation.
>
> Eelco
>
>
> On 6/21/06, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > i am also thinking of moving getNestedModel into a separate interface
> > because not all models have nested models, and im not even sure we need it
> > period so removing it completely is also an option imho
> >
> > thoughts?
> >
> >  -igor
> >
> >
> >
> > On 6/21/06, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I'm looking bit deeper and it seems that the semantics of IWrapModel is
> > > slightly different than I though, so just silently ignore the question :)
> > >
> > > Matej Knopp wrote:
> > > > Sorry, I meant getNestedModel of course (as there's no such thing as
> > > > getWrappedModel).
> > > >
> > > > Matej Knopp wrote:
> > > >> Hi,
> > > >>
> > > >> I'm going through the big model change in 2.0 and I noticed that now we
> > > >> have IWrapModel, but IModel still contains getWrappedModel().
> > > >>
> > > >> Wouldn't it be cleaner if the getWrappedModel was a member of
> > IWrapModel?
> > > >>
> > > >> -Matej
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> _______________________________________________
> > > >> Wicket-develop mailing list
> > > >> Wicket-develop@lists.sourceforge.net
> > > >>
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Wicket-develop mailing list
> > > > Wicket-develop@lists.sourceforge.net
> > > >
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Wicket-develop mailing list
> > > Wicket-develop@lists.sourceforge.net
> > >
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wicket-develop mailing list
> > Wicket-develop@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wicket-develop mailing list
> Wicket-develop@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
>


-- 
Download Wicket 1.2 now! Write Ajax applications without touching JavaScript!
-- http://wicketframework.org

All the advantages of Linux Managed Hosting--Without the Cost and Risk!
Fully trained technicians. The highest number of Red Hat certifications in
the hosting industry. Fanatical Support. Click to learn more
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=107521&bid=248729&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Wicket-develop mailing list
Wicket-develop@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop

Reply via email to