getNestedModel was what we plussed on, right? I'm not sure how you can do without IWrapModel though. It's used in several wrapOnxx methods, and it's used to keep the parameterized type. I didn't look at it in a lot of detail though, so Igor/ Johan will know that better.
Eelco On 6/22/06, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I also think we should get rid of getNestedModel and IWrapModel. > Anyone objects? > > -Matej > > Martijn Dashorst wrote: > > +1 for 2.0 > > > > less is more. > > > > Martijn > > > > On 6/21/06, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> If we can can rid of it, all the better. I don't think the semantics > >> are great, and they are covered through other means now. If we remove > >> getNestedModel, we should also remove > >> wicket.Component#sameRootModel(wicket.Component) and > >> wicket.Component#sameRootModel(IModel) and update the documentation. > >> > >> Eelco > >> > >> > >> On 6/21/06, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> i am also thinking of moving getNestedModel into a separate interface > >>> because not all models have nested models, and im not even sure we need it > >>> period so removing it completely is also an option imho > >>> > >>> thoughts? > >>> > >>> -igor > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On 6/21/06, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>> I'm looking bit deeper and it seems that the semantics of IWrapModel is > >>>> slightly different than I though, so just silently ignore the question :) > >>>> > >>>> Matej Knopp wrote: > >>>>> Sorry, I meant getNestedModel of course (as there's no such thing as > >>>>> getWrappedModel). > >>>>> > >>>>> Matej Knopp wrote: > >>>>>> Hi, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I'm going through the big model change in 2.0 and I noticed that now we > >>>>>> have IWrapModel, but IModel still contains getWrappedModel(). > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Wouldn't it be cleaner if the getWrappedModel was a member of > >>> IWrapModel? > >>>>>> -Matej > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>>> Wicket-develop mailing list > >>>>>> Wicket-develop@lists.sourceforge.net > >>>>>> > >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>> Wicket-develop mailing list > >>>>> Wicket-develop@lists.sourceforge.net > >>>>> > >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> Wicket-develop mailing list > >>>> Wicket-develop@lists.sourceforge.net > >>>> > >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Wicket-develop mailing list > >>> Wicket-develop@lists.sourceforge.net > >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Wicket-develop mailing list > >> Wicket-develop@lists.sourceforge.net > >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop > >> > > > > > > > All the advantages of Linux Managed Hosting--Without the Cost and Risk! > Fully trained technicians. The highest number of Red Hat certifications in > the hosting industry. Fanatical Support. Click to learn more > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=107521&bid=248729&dat=121642 > _______________________________________________ > Wicket-develop mailing list > Wicket-develop@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop > All the advantages of Linux Managed Hosting--Without the Cost and Risk! Fully trained technicians. The highest number of Red Hat certifications in the hosting industry. Fanatical Support. Click to learn more http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=107521&bid=248729&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Wicket-develop mailing list Wicket-develop@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
