I also think we should get rid of getNestedModel and IWrapModel. Anyone objects?
-Matej Martijn Dashorst wrote: > +1 for 2.0 > > less is more. > > Martijn > > On 6/21/06, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> If we can can rid of it, all the better. I don't think the semantics >> are great, and they are covered through other means now. If we remove >> getNestedModel, we should also remove >> wicket.Component#sameRootModel(wicket.Component) and >> wicket.Component#sameRootModel(IModel) and update the documentation. >> >> Eelco >> >> >> On 6/21/06, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> i am also thinking of moving getNestedModel into a separate interface >>> because not all models have nested models, and im not even sure we need it >>> period so removing it completely is also an option imho >>> >>> thoughts? >>> >>> -igor >>> >>> >>> >>> On 6/21/06, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> I'm looking bit deeper and it seems that the semantics of IWrapModel is >>>> slightly different than I though, so just silently ignore the question :) >>>> >>>> Matej Knopp wrote: >>>>> Sorry, I meant getNestedModel of course (as there's no such thing as >>>>> getWrappedModel). >>>>> >>>>> Matej Knopp wrote: >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm going through the big model change in 2.0 and I noticed that now we >>>>>> have IWrapModel, but IModel still contains getWrappedModel(). >>>>>> >>>>>> Wouldn't it be cleaner if the getWrappedModel was a member of >>> IWrapModel? >>>>>> -Matej >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Wicket-develop mailing list >>>>>> Wicket-develop@lists.sourceforge.net >>>>>> >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Wicket-develop mailing list >>>>> Wicket-develop@lists.sourceforge.net >>>>> >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Wicket-develop mailing list >>>> Wicket-develop@lists.sourceforge.net >>>> >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Wicket-develop mailing list >>> Wicket-develop@lists.sourceforge.net >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop >>> >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wicket-develop mailing list >> Wicket-develop@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop >> > > All the advantages of Linux Managed Hosting--Without the Cost and Risk! Fully trained technicians. The highest number of Red Hat certifications in the hosting industry. Fanatical Support. Click to learn more http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=107521&bid=248729&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Wicket-develop mailing list Wicket-develop@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
