If we can can rid of it, all the better. I don't think the semantics
are great, and they are covered through other means now. If we remove
getNestedModel, we should also remove
wicket.Component#sameRootModel(wicket.Component) and
wicket.Component#sameRootModel(IModel) and update the documentation.

Eelco


On 6/21/06, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i am also thinking of moving getNestedModel into a separate interface
> because not all models have nested models, and im not even sure we need it
> period so removing it completely is also an option imho
>
> thoughts?
>
>  -igor
>
>
>
> On 6/21/06, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm looking bit deeper and it seems that the semantics of IWrapModel is
> > slightly different than I though, so just silently ignore the question :)
> >
> > Matej Knopp wrote:
> > > Sorry, I meant getNestedModel of course (as there's no such thing as
> > > getWrappedModel).
> > >
> > > Matej Knopp wrote:
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> I'm going through the big model change in 2.0 and I noticed that now we
> > >> have IWrapModel, but IModel still contains getWrappedModel().
> > >>
> > >> Wouldn't it be cleaner if the getWrappedModel was a member of
> IWrapModel?
> > >>
> > >> -Matej
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> Wicket-develop mailing list
> > >> Wicket-develop@lists.sourceforge.net
> > >>
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Wicket-develop mailing list
> > > Wicket-develop@lists.sourceforge.net
> > >
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wicket-develop mailing list
> > Wicket-develop@lists.sourceforge.net
> >
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
> >
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wicket-develop mailing list
> Wicket-develop@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
>
>
>


_______________________________________________
Wicket-develop mailing list
Wicket-develop@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop

Reply via email to