And i still don't know if that should really returns a IWrapModel thing or just a IModel
The question is do we really need to know if it is a wrap model in some cases.
Don't know.
johan
On 6/22/06, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Btw., ICompoundModel is no longer used, is it?
Matej Knopp wrote:
> public interface IInheritableModel<T> extends IModel<T>
> {
> <C> IModel<C> wrapOnInhertance(Component<C> component);
> }
>
> But maybe it makes sense to have a "Marker" interface for inherited models.
>
> -Matej
>
> Eelco Hillenius wrote:
>> getNestedModel was what we plussed on, right? I'm not sure how you can
>> do without IWrapModel though. It's used in several wrapOnxx methods,
>> and it's used to keep the parameterized type. I didn't look at it in a
>> lot of detail though, so Igor/ Johan will know that better.
>>
>> Eelco
>>
>>
>>
>> On 6/22/06, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I also think we should get rid of getNestedModel and IWrapModel.
>>> Anyone objects?
>>>
>>> -Matej
>>>
>>> Martijn Dashorst wrote:
>>>> +1 for 2.0
>>>>
>>>> less is more.
>>>>
>>>> Martijn
>>>>
>>>> On 6/21/06, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>> If we can can rid of it, all the better. I don't think the semantics
>>>>> are great, and they are covered through other means now. If we remove
>>>>> getNestedModel, we should also remove
>>>>> wicket.Component#sameRootModel(wicket.Component ) and
>>>>> wicket.Component#sameRootModel(IModel) and update the documentation.
>>>>>
>>>>> Eelco
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 6/21/06, Igor Vaynberg < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>> i am also thinking of moving getNestedModel into a separate interface
>>>>>> because not all models have nested models, and im not even sure we need it
>>>>>> period so removing it completely is also an option imho
>>>>>>
>>>>>> thoughts?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -igor
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 6/21/06, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>>> I'm looking bit deeper and it seems that the semantics of IWrapModel is
>>>>>>> slightly different than I though, so just silently ignore the question :)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Matej Knopp wrote:
>>>>>>>> Sorry, I meant getNestedModel of course (as there's no such thing as
>>>>>>>> getWrappedModel).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Matej Knopp wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'm going through the big model change in 2.0 and I noticed that now we
>>>>>>>>> have IWrapModel, but IModel still contains getWrappedModel().
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Wouldn't it be cleaner if the getWrappedModel was a member of
>>>>>> IWrapModel?
>>>>>>>>> -Matej
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> Wicket-develop mailing list
>>>>>>>>> Wicket-develop@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> Wicket-develop mailing list
>>>>>>>> Wicket-develop@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Wicket-develop mailing list
>>>>>>> Wicket-develop@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Wicket-develop mailing list
>>>>>> Wicket-develop@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Wicket-develop mailing list
>>>>> Wicket-develop@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
>>>>>
>>> All the advantages of Linux Managed Hosting--Without the Cost and Risk!
>>> Fully trained technicians. The highest number of Red Hat certifications in
>>> the hosting industry. Fanatical Support. Click to learn more
>>> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=107521&bid=248729&dat=121642
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Wicket-develop mailing list
>>> Wicket-develop@lists.sourceforge.net
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
>>>
>> All the advantages of Linux Managed Hosting--Without the Cost and Risk!
>> Fully trained technicians. The highest number of Red Hat certifications in
>> the hosting industry. Fanatical Support. Click to learn more
>> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=107521&bid=248729&dat=121642
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wicket-develop mailing list
>> Wicket-develop@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
>>
>
>
> All the advantages of Linux Managed Hosting--Without the Cost and Risk!
> Fully trained technicians. The highest number of Red Hat certifications in
> the hosting industry. Fanatical Support. Click to learn more
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=107521&bid=248729&dat=121642
> _______________________________________________
> Wicket-develop mailing list
> Wicket-develop@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
>
All the advantages of Linux Managed Hosting--Without the Cost and Risk!
Fully trained technicians. The highest number of Red Hat certifications in
the hosting industry. Fanatical Support. Click to learn more
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=107521&bid=248729&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Wicket-develop mailing list
Wicket-develop@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________ Wicket-develop mailing list Wicket-develop@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
