https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49860
--- Comment #17 from Teles <[email protected]> --- (In reply to comment #14) > (In reply to comment #13) > > Is the procedure on these requests to suggest that the community was > > mistaken? > > That is it not really the community desire? A sysadmin would do that? > > Yes, it is, if the request is seemingly in violation of the basic Wikimedia > principles of openness and accessbility. But it isn't. What is the "violation"? Comments 9 and 10 are more than enough to show why you have no reason to ignore the vote page. Usually, votes have the half of the participation we had and that is due to the long-term discussion we had and the way we announced the page to everybody. > > > > What I am > > saying is that what is being questioned should not be and maybe it is > > outside > > of the sysadmin's decision to judge that. A sysadmin would know that, but I > > don't know if these out of nowhere imposed barriers are really procedural. > > You seem to be under impression that you're speaking to your employees or > subordinates. This is clearly a wrong impression, please snap out of it. Both There is no logic on that assertion. I am only stating facts on my comments. All that I said is that it is up to sysadmins to decide and the some barriers being imposed are not on any written rule and are only personal opinions. > Nemo and I are volunteers who ask people like you for answers and > clarifications so that the sysadmins don't have to and the requests can be > processed more quickly. > > (In fact, every single person who responded on this bug until now is a > volunteer.) > > > > That > > is why I am asking sysadmin review. We talk on community. Here, we show the > > result of something and the ones entitled will deny or accept with their > > reasons; we shouldn't start another conversation here and put invented > > barriers. This page [1] is not being followed. > > > > [1] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wiki_configuration_change > > That's not a rulebook, that's a guide. It also says that "Gaining on-wiki > consensus and filing a shell bug does not guarantee that the request will be > fulfilled. Ultimate authority lies with the system administrators, and shell > bugs may be resolved INVALID or WONTFIX due to performance issues or other > considerations.". Please consider this. I am considering. Can you tell me a reason that would prevent to be done something that was done for five years? As I said, comments 9 and 10 clarify everything, but they still need to be "accepted" by somebody I don't know who is. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
