https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57891

--- Comment #16 from James Forrester <jforres...@wikimedia.org> ---
(In reply to MZMcBride from comment #15)
> (In reply to Kunal Mehta (Legoktm) from comment #14)
> > Krinkle has said
> > (<https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/94837/11/GlobalCssJs.hooks.php,cm>)
> > that we should add a configuration option to control this feature, which I
> > agree with. He also said that it should probably be disabled on WMF wikis,
> > which I disagree with. ;)
> 
> I disagree with adding a configuration variable unless there's a compelling
> use-case. If you install the GlobalCssJs extension on your wikifarm, I think
> it's natural to then have ... global CSS and JS. If Wikimedia wikis aren't
> going to use this option, I'm not sure who ever would. Until there's a
> reasonable use-case for including a feature flag, I'd leave it out.

I understood that the point of this bug was user-level farm-global JS and CSS.
Wiki-level farm-global JS and CSS that any admin on meta can edit would
instantly turn this immediately into a WONTFIX, IMO.

Use case enough?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l

Reply via email to