https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57891
--- Comment #16 from James Forrester <jforres...@wikimedia.org> --- (In reply to MZMcBride from comment #15) > (In reply to Kunal Mehta (Legoktm) from comment #14) > > Krinkle has said > > (<https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/94837/11/GlobalCssJs.hooks.php,cm>) > > that we should add a configuration option to control this feature, which I > > agree with. He also said that it should probably be disabled on WMF wikis, > > which I disagree with. ;) > > I disagree with adding a configuration variable unless there's a compelling > use-case. If you install the GlobalCssJs extension on your wikifarm, I think > it's natural to then have ... global CSS and JS. If Wikimedia wikis aren't > going to use this option, I'm not sure who ever would. Until there's a > reasonable use-case for including a feature flag, I'd leave it out. I understood that the point of this bug was user-level farm-global JS and CSS. Wiki-level farm-global JS and CSS that any admin on meta can edit would instantly turn this immediately into a WONTFIX, IMO. Use case enough? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l