https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57891
Isarra <zhoris...@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |zhoris...@gmail.com --- Comment #17 from Isarra <zhoris...@gmail.com> --- (In reply to James Forrester from comment #16) > I understood that the point of this bug was user-level farm-global JS and > CSS. Wiki-level farm-global JS and CSS that any admin on meta can edit would > instantly turn this immediately into a WONTFIX, IMO. Why would that turn it into a wontfix? Meta admins already have access to a lot of global features, including centralnotice - which, from what I understand, allows the insertion of any arbitrary css and js. We already trust them with that, and they've shown to be sensible, so how would this be any different? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l