https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57891

Isarra <zhoris...@gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |zhoris...@gmail.com

--- Comment #17 from Isarra <zhoris...@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to James Forrester from comment #16)
> I understood that the point of this bug was user-level farm-global JS and
> CSS. Wiki-level farm-global JS and CSS that any admin on meta can edit would
> instantly turn this immediately into a WONTFIX, IMO.

Why would that turn it into a wontfix? Meta admins already have access to a lot
of global features, including centralnotice - which, from what I understand,
allows the insertion of any arbitrary css and js. We already trust them with
that, and they've shown to be sensible, so how would this be any different?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l

Reply via email to