The DBnary project "Wiktionary as Linguistic Linked Open Data" at:
http://kaiko.getalp.org/about-dbnary/ http://kaiko.getalp.org/sparql can be used as a reference. I am basing my IEG project to visualize etymologies from Wktionary on it: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:IEG/A_graphical_and_interactive_etymology_dictionary_based_on_Wiktionary is based on at project/ Cheers, Ester On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 7:39 PM, Daniel Kinzler <daniel.kinz...@wikimedia.de > wrote: > Am 21.09.2016 um 19:23 schrieb Eric Scott: > > A substantial amount of work in the LOD community seems to have gone > into Ontolex: > > > > https://www.w3.org/community/ontolex/wiki/Final_Model_Specification > > > > Is there any concern with aligning WD's model to this standard? > > Thanks for pointing to this! > > From a first look, the models seem to roughly align: > > What we call a "Lexeme" corresponds to a "Lexical Entry" in ontolex. > What we call a "Form" corresponds to a "Form" in ontolex. > What we call a "Sense" corresponds to a "Lexical Sense & Reference" in > ontolex, > although in ontolex, a reference to a Concept is required, while in our > model > that reference would be optional, but a natural language gloss is required. > > So the models seem to match fine on a conceptual level. Perhaps someone > with > more expertise in RDF modeling can provide a more detailed analysis. > > -- > Daniel Kinzler > Senior Software Developer > > Wikimedia Deutschland > Gesellschaft zur Förderung Freien Wissens e.V. > > _______________________________________________ > Wikidata mailing list > Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata >
_______________________________________________ Wikidata mailing list Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
