Am 21.09.2016 um 19:23 schrieb Eric Scott: > A substantial amount of work in the LOD community seems to have gone into > Ontolex: > > https://www.w3.org/community/ontolex/wiki/Final_Model_Specification > > Is there any concern with aligning WD's model to this standard?
Thanks for pointing to this! From a first look, the models seem to roughly align: What we call a "Lexeme" corresponds to a "Lexical Entry" in ontolex. What we call a "Form" corresponds to a "Form" in ontolex. What we call a "Sense" corresponds to a "Lexical Sense & Reference" in ontolex, although in ontolex, a reference to a Concept is required, while in our model that reference would be optional, but a natural language gloss is required. So the models seem to match fine on a conceptual level. Perhaps someone with more expertise in RDF modeling can provide a more detailed analysis. -- Daniel Kinzler Senior Software Developer Wikimedia Deutschland Gesellschaft zur Förderung Freien Wissens e.V. _______________________________________________ Wikidata mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
