Hi Valerie, I agree excellent suggestion --- I'm also keen to see a review and rating system implemented.
In addition to this, I think WE should also think about ways to support feedback and discussion on how OERs were used and reflections as a feedback loop. I also think some form of visual representation of the status of the OER would help -- for example: Phase 1: "Draft resource under development" Phase 2: "Resource is ready for review comments." Phase 3: "Review phase is completed and the resource is "Published" Phase 4: "Resource has received an acceptable number of usage comments and feedback from teachers". See for example: http://wikieducator.org/Template:OER_Metadata#status Thoughts? Wayne 2009/10/22 valerie <[email protected]> > > The other thing that I would like to see is a review and rating system > within WikiEducator to help direct others to the strong content that > is available for adoption with or without editing and customization. > > If people make copies of their own, it would be wonderful to track > that fact, too. Show all the versions that were forked off from the > original. Further information that this is important content. > > > > -- Wayne Mackintosh, Ph.D. Director, International Centre for Open Education, Otago Polytechnic, New Zealand. Board of Directors, OER Foundation. Founder and Community Council Member, Wikieducator, www.wikieducator.org Mobile +64 21 2436 380 Skype: WGMNZ1 Twitter: OERFoundation, Mackiwg --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "WikiEducator" group. To visit wikieducator: http://www.wikieducator.org To visit the discussion forum: http://groups.google.com/group/wikieducator To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
