On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 5:44 PM, Katie Chan <k...@ktchan.info> wrote: > Of course it's all very well believing in the good work and ethics of those > currently with those type of rights. However it's a different issue entirely > to assume there will never be a bad apple. If that's your attitude, then it > have to follow that you believe the ombudsman commission is superfluous.
I'm not advocating for anything in particular -- I could care less if the ombudsman commission made an OTRS queue. It's entirely up to them. :-) I'm just bringing up the issues with both sides, and making it clear that *someone* will almost always have access to something, no matter what. It's important that all sides of the issue are brought up before choosing the best solution. :-) Also, Philippe pointed out that there might be logs of who accesses lists with the master password. So, while they can still access the lists with the password, it might not be anonymous. -- Casey Brown Cbrown1023 _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list Wikimediaemail@example.com Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l