On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 1:57 AM, Mike Dupont <jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com> wrote: > The articles are hosted on archive.org, and then transfered to wikia, > I could make some review tools, but where to host them? > mike > Well, why do you want to host them? Or, more specifically, why do you want to host them somewhere other than archive.org?
I definitely understand wanting to save the content of these articles just in case someone wants to work on fixing them. Wikipedia's temporary undeletion process for people who wish to do this, is simply not convenient. But archive.org seems to take care of that purpose just fine. If the *topic* is deemed "notable", just the article itself is of very poor quality, then once these have undergone manual review and intervention, the right place to host them would be back in Wikipedia. It would also be nice to have a wiki for topics deemed by Wikipedia to be "not notable". But this is a much different problem, and I don't believe it is served well by the autopopulation of mostly very low quality articles. Also, sorry if this was already answered, but where are they on archive.org? _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list Wikimediaemail@example.com Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l