The iPhone was a commercial success because it let you do the basic functions easily and intuitively, and looked shiny at the same time. We do not charge a price; our "win" comes by people using our product. If we can present the product in such a way that more people use it, it is a success for us.
I do stand by my example :-) On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 10:37 PM Michael Peel <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 18 Jan 2016, at 22:35, Magnus Manske <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > As one can be overly conservative, one can also be overly enthusiastic. I > > would hope the Foundation by now understands better how to handle new > > software releases. Apple here shows the way: Basic functionality, but > > working smoothly first. > > But at a huge cost premium? I'm not sure that's a good example to make > here. :-/ > > Thanks, > Mike > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines > New messages to: [email protected] > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe> _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines New messages to: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
