It's now over a month since the appended exchange, when I suggested that the answer "All change has negative connotations to some members of the community", to the question "Could this Recommendation [to, in part, allow material with NC and ND licences] have a negative impact/change?" be rewritten to actually reflect the proposal's real and significant risks.
I've just checked, and it's unchanged. On Mon, 12 Aug 2019 at 17:52, Andy Mabbett <a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk> wrote: > > On Mon, 12 Aug 2019 at 16:51, Nicole Ebber <nicole.eb...@wikimedia.de> wrote: > > > This is a > > process for all of us to shape our shared future, together; let’s keep > > engaging and challenging one another in this same spirit. > > Perhaps it would also be in keeping with that spirit for this: > > Q4a. Could this Recommendation have a negative impact/change? > > All change has negative connotations to some members of the community > > to be re-written, to actually reflect the proposal's real and significant > risks? > > As it stands, I do not find it to be "solution-oriented", nor > indicative of "due review and reflection", nor "in the spirit of > collegial collaboration", and I do not think anyone could plausibly > argue that it is any of those things. -- Andy Mabbett @pigsonthewing http://pigsonthewing.org.uk _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
