This is largely my feeling as well. If you look at one of Andrew's links: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Communications/Wikimedia_brands/2030_research_and_planning/community_review/brainstorm
You'll see some quite vigorous opposition to the name change and robust support for explicitly not changing the name. Fast-forward more than six months and now 20% of people have to actively oppose something or it's supported, even though there is no way that you'll get a response rate on *anything* *ever* to be 20% on a large email list. On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 12:48 PM MZMcBride <[email protected]> wrote: > Andrew Lih wrote: > >Folks, it's not clear this email thread is going to register at all as > >feedback for this process. > > Hi. > > I haven't been following this discussion too closely, but my sense is that > a few people within Wikimedia Foundation Inc. have already decided on an > outcome and are seeking "support" and "feedback" to legitimize and > validate that predetermined decision. > > MZMcBride > > > _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
