On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 10:05 PM, Confusing Manifestation <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'd also like to see some kind of system where organisations (not > necessarily donors) could help us improve their articles - as long as > it's made abundantly clear to them at the start that the aim is to get > a well-sourced, neutral article rather than a promotional puff piece, > it would still often be in their interests to help since it would > result in an article that at the very least won't be an attack page, > and by keeping everything out in the open at least means that there > will be constant scrutiny (rather than the standard pattern of someone > editing, and someone else identifying them as having a conflict of > interest, and the media exploding into a frenzy of "X edited an > article on Y, shame on X!").
Don't like the look of this at all. Money and articles don't mix. -- Andrew Garrett _______________________________________________ Wikimediaau-l mailing list Wikimediaau-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaau-l
