If you have enough space I would go with this. If you need to shorten it, skip 
the bit about the stained glass.

Freedom of panorama in the UK

Under UK law you can upload a photo of the architecture of any building (inside 
or out) without infringing any copyright. The same applies to any 3D artwork, 
such as a statue, provided that the artwork is in a public place (somewhere 
normally open to the public, including interior spaces such as museums), and is 
permanently on view there.  So, you can freely upload a photo of the Angel of 
the North, even though the sculpture itself is copyright-protected.  The rule 
applies to stained glass on permanent public view, but not to other 2D works 
such as posters or signs - even if they are permanently sited in a public 
place.  Note that the rules outside the UK are often much more restrictive.”

Michael

On 17 Sep 2013, at 17:12, Stevie Benton wrote:

> Thanks Michael for your comments. Here's the version I currently have:
> 
> "Freedom of panorama in the UK - Under UK law you can upload a photo of the 
> architecture of any building (inside or outside) without infringing any 
> copyright. The same applies to any 3D artwork, such as a statue, provided 
> that it is permanently located in a public space (somewhere normally open to 
> the public, including interior spaces such as museums). You can freely upload 
> a photo of the Angel of the North, even though the sculpture itself is 
> copyright-protected. Note that this only applies to 3D works and not 2D works 
> such as posters or signs - even if they are on public display. Note also that 
> the rules outside the UK are often different."
> 
> 
> We've gone backwards and forwards on this quite a lot, so, executive decision 
> - Michael, can you take a look, recommend any changes and we'll go with your 
> final, recommended version. 
> 
> Thank you everyone,
> 
> Stevie
> 
> 
> On 17 September 2013 17:07, Michael Maggs <[email protected]> wrote:
> No, definitely not an improvement - sorry!   
> 
> This version goes far beyond a copyedit and introduces substantive and 
> incorrect changes on points of law.  First, it mixes up buildings (which do 
> not have to be public) and and sculptures (which do).  Second, the text 
> appears to be based on an incorrect understanding that the underlying legal 
> distinction is between 2D and 3D, which it is results in a completely wrong 
> explanation of why stained glass is OK (actually, it is because stained glass 
> falls under a peculiar category of UK copyright called 'works of artistic 
> craftsmanship’, a category which also would also include 3D designer 
> jewellery).
> 
> Please can we revert back to my last draft, and if needed edit for 
> readability only?
> 
> Michael
> 
>> 
>> On Tuesday, 17 September 2013, Stevie Benton wrote:
>> Thanks Jonathan. Before I go through the awkward job of tinkering with the 
>> InDesign file, what do other people think about the revision?
>> 
>> Thank you,
>> 
>> Stevie
>> 
>> 
>> On 17 September 2013 12:47, Jonathan Cardy <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>> Thanks all,
>> 
>> Possible revised wording with examples from the borderline and less 
>> repetition.
>> 
>> UK Freedom of panorama
>> 
>> Under UK law, you can photograph, upload and share with the world a photo of 
>> any 3d artifact such as a building or sculpture that is permanently publicly 
>> displayed in the UK, even if the object is still under copyright.  But you 
>> need to check four things:
>> 1 Is it permanently on display? Temporary exhibits such as on the fourth 
>> plinth in Trafalgar square  are not included, but the Angel of the North is.
>> 2 When you took the photograph were you somewhere normally open to the 
>> public? Inside a pub or museum is fine, where you work or were a guest 
>> probably isn't.
>> 3 Was it 3d not 2d? Buildings and sculpture are 3d, graffiti, paintings and 
>> signs are 2d. So a photograph of stained glass illuminated by light shining 
>> through it is 3d, but the same stained glass window reflecting your flash at 
>> night is 2d and might still be under copyright.
>> 4 Did you take the photo in the UK? Most other countries have stricter rules.
>> 
>> 
>> Regards
>> 
>> 
>> Jonathan Cardy
>> GLAM (Galleries, Libraries, Archives & Museums) Organiser/
>> Trefnydd GLAM (Galeriau, Llyfrgelloedd, Archifdai a llawer Mwy!) 
>> Wikimedia UK
>> 0207 065 0990
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>> Thank you Martin for your kind words.  Harry's edit a
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> - Andrew Gray
>>   [email protected]
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikimedia UK mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
>> WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia UK mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
> WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Stevie Benton
> Communications Organiser
> Wikimedia UK
> +44 (0) 20 7065 0993 / +44 (0) 7803 505 173
> @StevieBenton
> Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and 
> Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered 
> Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT. 
> United Kingdom. Wikimedia UK is the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia 
> movement. The Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation (who 
> operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects).
> Wikimedia UK is an independent non-profit charity with no legal control over 
> Wikipedia nor responsibility for its contents.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia UK mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
> WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org

_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org

Reply via email to