In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Peter S
Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>
>robert w hall wrote:
>
>> I doubt that a dependencies-based package manager (eg rpm with deps
>> enabled) would ever for example let you install win4lin on a tiny
>> slack4.0 system (libc5-based) - where I'm using libc2.0.7pre6 as the
>> glibc library!
>
>Why would it? The binary won't work,
well the point is of course it DOES!
> so is netraverse better off
>answering all the resulting flaming questions about why it's
>broken?
No, in a case like this I clearly carry the can for not providing
minimum spec - but I get the gain, a working system on a �150 laptop
which I'd have to bin otherwise, since there's not room to install a
full glibc2.2.x system.
and that's the beauty of slack
OK I'm done - (this is clearly a dialogue of the deaf)
Bob
--
robert w hall
_______________________________________________
Win4Lin-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.netraverse.com/mailman/listinfo/win4lin-users
