Yes. When our 8510s melted with AVC and we went to 8540s, we learned what those limits are. I would have thought it would have been made public by now. Not for me to share, but it's interesting.
Lee Badman Network Architect/Wireless TME Syracuse University 315.443.3003 -----Original Message----- From: Samuel Clements [[email protected]] Received: Tuesday, 06 Sep 2016, 17:03 To: [email protected] [[email protected]] Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco 8540s, and 8.3.102 Code That's insightful. "To find out the actual scaling limits of the controllers, contact your Cisco account team." So, out of curiosity, have you contacted your Cisco account team? ;-) -Sam On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 3:11 PM, Lee H Badman <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi Sam, We are asking for specific bugs. And for what "load" amounts to in AVC parlance, and where to monitor that. Client counts? Throughput? Flows? CPU/Memory? Buffer counters somewhere? We are supposedly bumping into https://bst.cloudapps.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCuz10099/?reffering_site=dumpcr (workaround- just don't use AVC!) and another that pointed to SSL user traffic being delayed/dropped. -Lee Lee Badman | Network Architect (CWDP, CWNA, CWSP, Mobility+) Information Technology Services 206 Machinery Hall 120 Smith Drive Syracuse, New York 13244 t 315.443.3003<tel:315.443.3003> f 315.443.4325<tel:315.443.4325> e [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> w its.syr.edu<http://its.syr.edu> SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY syr.edu<http://syr.edu> From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf Of Samuel Clements Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2016 4:04 PM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco 8540s, and 8.3.102 Code >TAC has mentioned 8.3.102 as having AVC fixes, but I don't see anything after >looking at release notes. CSCuz60441 shows up in the bug toolkit as being resolved in 8.3 CCO. Aside from that, there doesn't appear to be much on the AVC front resolved in this release. Have you asked the TAC engineer for specific bugs that they believe you're bumping up against? That should be a fair ask from any customer to their manufacturer... -Sam On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 2:31 PM, Lee H Badman <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Sigh... we continue to have WLC performance issues seemingly related to AVC, even after upgrading to 8.2.121. TAC has mentioned 8.3.102 as having AVC fixes, but I don't see anything after looking at release notes. Anyone using 8.3.102. or heard any rumblings that are of concern? Lee Badman | Network Architect (CWDP, CWNA, CWSP, Mobility+) Information Technology Services 206 Machinery Hall 120 Smith Drive Syracuse, New York 13244 t 315.443.3003<tel:315.443.3003> f 315.443.4325<tel:315.443.4325> e [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> w its.syr.edu<http://its.syr.edu> SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY syr.edu<http://syr.edu> ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/. ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/. ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/. ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/. ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
